[Util][NFC] OptimizeIntArithmetic: reduce calls to eraseState (iree-org#19130)

This pass is causing long compilation times for llama3 405b (even when
cherry-picking llvm/llvm-project#115399). The
majority of the time is spent in this one pass. The compilation times
improve when calling `eraseState` only when ops are deleted. This is
similar to the upstream listeners in `UnsignedWhenEquivalent.cpp` and
`IntRangeOptimizations.cpp`. It appears this function loops over all
`LatticeAnchors` on each invocation to find the one to delete, causing
it to be slow. My (nonrigorous) experiment showed a decrease from 18 min
to 3 min compile time. My main concern here would be this affecting
correctness, as I don't know if this has unaccounted for side effects.

Signed-off-by: Ian Wood <[email protected]>

Author: IanWood1

compiler/src/iree/compiler/Dialect/Util/Transforms/OptimizeIntArithmetic.cpp

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #include "mlir/Pass/PassRegistry.h"
 #include "mlir/Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h"
 
-#define DEBUG_TYPE "iree-util-optimize-arithmetic"
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "iree-util-optimize-int-arithmetic"
 using llvm::dbgs;
 
 using namespace mlir::dataflow;
@@ -289,43 +289,7 @@ class DataFlowListener : public RewriterBase::Listener {
   void notifyOperationErased(Operation *op) override {
     s.eraseState(s.getProgramPointAfter(op));
     for (Value res : op->getResults())
-      flushValue(res);
-  }
-  void notifyOperationModified(Operation *op) override {
-    for (Value res : op->getResults())
-      flushValue(res);
-  }
-  void notifyOperationReplaced(Operation *op, Operation *replacement) override {
-    for (Value res : op->getResults())
-      flushValue(res);
-  }
-
-  void notifyOperationReplaced(Operation *op, ValueRange replacement) override {
-    for (Value res : op->getResults())
-      flushValue(res);
-  }
-
-  void flushValue(Value value) {
-    SmallVector<Value> worklist;
-    SmallVector<Value> process;
-    worklist.push_back(value);
-
-    while (!worklist.empty()) {
-      process.clear();
-      process.swap(worklist);
-      for (Value childValue : process) {
-        auto *state = s.lookupState<IntegerValueRangeLattice>(childValue);
-        if (!state) {
-          continue;
-        }
-        s.eraseState(childValue);
-        for (auto user : childValue.getUsers()) {
-          for (Value result : user->getResults()) {
-            worklist.push_back(result);
-          }
-        }
-      }
-    }
+      s.eraseState(res);
   }
 
   DataFlowSolver &s;
@@ -386,11 +350,14 @@ class OptimizeIntArithmeticPass
 
     FrozenRewritePatternSet frozenPatterns(std::move(patterns));
     for (int i = 0;; ++i) {
+      LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "  * Starting iteration: " << i << "\n");
       if (failed(solver.initializeAndRun(op))) {
         emitError(op->getLoc()) << "failed to perform int range analysis";
         return signalPassFailure();
       }
 
+      LLVM_DEBUG(
+          dbgs() << "  * Finished Running Solver -- Applying Patterns\n");
       bool changed = false;
       if (failed(applyPatternsAndFoldGreedily(op, frozenPatterns, config,
                                               &changed))) {