Peer review #2 #2
Description
Peer review#2
- The program works as mentioned in the README at current state.
- As mentioned in the README the program doesn't have navigation. Adding it as soon as possible will make it easier to test and use the program.
- After submitting an idea the only option is to logout afterwards while being the only way to logout. Or changing the address but that is not very intuitive.
- Once you browse available ideas it is not possible to return to the main page without changing the websites address. This was mentioned in README. But navigation is quite a big part of web based programs.
- Submitting a project lets you submit a project with way too long name and description however if the name or description is too long it doesn't get saved to the database. The name of the project can exceed at least 200 characters which is way too much and looks silly on the site.
- Currently using 4 databases. Would be a good idea to add one more to get to minimum requirement of the course which is 5.
- Used databases are good.
- Overall "look" of the program isn't the nicest but at the same time it's not the most important thing so if there is time I would make the UI better.
- Overall code is good. I don't know why create_tables.py exists in github since its is not used in the program.
Overall good program that will become great after fixing navigation and implementing all of the features found in README.