Improve minutes

Co-authored-by: Eduardo Rodrigues <[email protected]>

Author: graeme-a-stewart

organization/_posts/2025/2025-06-03-steering.md

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Questions/feedback to us:
     - Would be useful to also address in the EVERSE context
 - In general, how to improve HEP engagement with Scientific Python? The news from the Scikit-HEP project, which is part of the first domain stacks to integrate their core projects, are very welcomed and good to hear.
 - AI/ML is ever more important and ubiquitous, yet the HSF has no activity area around it. Furthermore, most ML is Python after all, and Python is big in the HSF. Is it purely historical or ...? Has the HSF thought of engaging strongly with the IML group or even bring it to the HSF?
-    - Scope of IML is LHC; similar question was raised about EUCAIF; these are big groups and not necessarily a good idea to attempt to start any HSF AI/ML activity; we can explore how to work together/support each other, e.g., integration into the frameworks; AI/ML is a *technique* and this is impossible to cover in an HSF activity
+    - Scope of IML is LHC; similar question was raised about EUCAIF; these are big groups and not necessarily a good idea to attempt to start any HSF AI/ML activity; we can explore how to work together/support each other, e.g., integration into the frameworks; AI/ML is a *technique* and this is impossible to cover in an HSF activity.
 - Discussion on SWIFT-HEP raised by LHCC, this will affect some people's funding and community efforts to work together between institutes.
 
 ### EPPSU Paper
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Do the bronze/silver/gold levels actually help? At the moment they mainly seem t
 
 An update has been informally proposed for now:
 
-> A simple “HSF Affiliated Project” badge, that says the project fulfils the Best Practice guidelines here: https://hepsoftwarefoundation.org/projects/guidelines.html and in particular the 9 general guidelines (not the 2 optional ones !).
+> A simple “HSF Affiliated Project” badge, that says the project fulfils the [Best Practice guidelines](https://hepsoftwarefoundation.org/projects/guidelines.html), and in particular the 9 general guidelines (not the 2 optional ones !).
 > There seemed to be support for the idea of having more nuanced badges, for having extra user support etc. - maybe we should just start with “implements best practice”, which should be relatively quick.
 
 We also propose to work with the experiments to compile a list of the software packages that are used.