You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was creating a pdf of about 80 images, 9 images per page, and first I used png files. It took about 2 minutes to create the pdf, and ended up with a 600MB pdf. Then I tried with jpg files. This took me 400ms (yes milliseconds). The pdf was around 63MB. Jpegs were quality 85, and about a fourth the size of pngs. Why is embedPng so slow compared with embedJpg?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was creating a pdf of about 80 images, 9 images per page, and first I used png files. It took about 2 minutes to create the pdf, and ended up with a 600MB pdf. Then I tried with jpg files. This took me 400ms (yes milliseconds). The pdf was around 63MB. Jpegs were quality 85, and about a fourth the size of pngs. Why is embedPng so slow compared with embedJpg?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions