Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (94 loc) · 5.8 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

105 lines (94 loc) · 5.8 KB

Batch vs. Stream Processing on AWS

A presentation outline covering the key concepts, services, and architectures for batch and stream data processing on Amazon Web Services.

Presentation Outline

1. Introduction to Data Processing Paradigms

  • What is Data Processing?
    • The collection and manipulation of data to produce meaningful information.
  • Core Concepts: Batch vs. Stream
    • Batch Processing: Processing large volumes of data at scheduled intervals.
    • Stream Processing: Processing data continuously and in real-time as it's generated.
  • Why the Right Model Matters
    • Impact on cost, latency, and business insights.

2. Deep Dive: Batch Processing

  • Characteristics:
    • Data Volume: Large, bounded datasets.
    • Latency: High latency (minutes to hours).
    • Throughput: High throughput is a primary goal.
    • Execution: Scheduled, periodic jobs.
  • Common Use Cases:
    • End-of-day reporting and analytics.
    • Payroll and billing systems.
    • Large-scale ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) jobs.
    • Genomic sequencing.
  • Key AWS Services for Batch Processing:
    • Amazon S3: Data lake storage for raw and processed data.
    • AWS Glue: Serverless ETL service for data preparation and loading.
    • Amazon EMR: Managed big data platform (Spark, Hadoop, Hive).
    • AWS Batch: Fully managed batch computing for scheduling and executing jobs.
    • Amazon Redshift: Data warehousing for large-scale analytics.
  • Pros & Cons:
    • Pros: Cost-effective for large datasets, high throughput, simple architecture.
    • Cons: High latency, insights are not real-time, can be complex to manage for ad-hoc queries.

3. Deep Dive: Stream Processing

  • Characteristics:
    • Data Volume: Small, unbounded, continuous data streams.
    • Latency: Low latency (sub-second to seconds).
    • Throughput: Can handle high-velocity data.
    • Execution: Continuous, event-driven processing.
  • Common Use Cases:
    • Real-time fraud detection in financial transactions.
    • IoT sensor data monitoring and alerting.
    • Live leaderboards for gaming applications.
    • Clickstream analysis for websites and mobile apps.
  • Key AWS Services for Stream Processing:
    • Amazon Kinesis:
      • Kinesis Data Streams: For ingesting and storing real-time data streams.
      • Kinesis Data Firehose: For loading streaming data into data stores.
      • Kinesis Data Analytics: For processing streams with SQL or Apache Flink.
    • AWS Lambda: Event-driven, serverless compute for processing individual events.
    • Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK): Fully managed Kafka service.
    • Amazon EMR: For running Spark Streaming or Flink on a managed cluster.
  • Pros & Cons:
    • Pros: Real-time insights, immediate response to events, highly scalable.
    • Cons: Can be more complex to design and manage, potential for higher operational costs, requires handling out-of-order data.

4. Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Comparison Table:
Feature Batch Processing Stream Processing
Data Scope Large, bounded datasets Individual records or micro-batches
Latency High (minutes to hours) Low (milliseconds to seconds)
Analysis Complex, deep analytics Simple analytics, transformations, alerting
Data Size Terabytes to Petabytes Kilobytes to Megabytes
Architecture Scheduled, job-oriented Continuous, event-driven

5. Hybrid Architectures: The Best of Both Worlds

  • Lambda Architecture:
    • Combines a batch layer for comprehensive, accurate views and a speed layer for real-time data.
    • Components: Batch Layer, Speed Layer, Serving Layer.
    • Pros: Fault-tolerant, provides both real-time and historical views.
    • Cons: High complexity, redundant logic across layers.
  • Kappa Architecture:
    • A simplified approach that treats everything as a stream.
    • Components: A single stream processing pipeline that handles both real-time and historical data reprocessing.
    • Pros: Simplified architecture, less code duplication.
    • Cons: Reprocessing large historical datasets can be challenging.

6. How to Choose the Right Approach

  • Key Factors to Consider:
    • Business Requirements: How quickly do you need insights?
    • Data Velocity & Volume: How fast is data arriving and how much is there?
    • Data Correctness: Can you tolerate estimations or do you need perfect accuracy?
    • Cost & Complexity: What is your budget and operational capacity?
  • Decision Flowchart/Questions:
    • Is real-time data critical for your application?
    • Are you dealing with unbounded, continuous data streams?
    • Is your primary goal large-scale, periodic data transformation?

7. Conclusion & Key Takeaways

  • Recap:
    • Batch is for large, scheduled workloads where latency is not a primary concern.
    • Stream is for real-time, continuous data where low latency is critical.
    • Hybrid models offer a balanced approach.
  • The Future of Data Processing:
    • Increasing adoption of real-time analytics.
    • The rise of unified platforms that handle both batch and stream (e.g., Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming).
  • Final Recommendation: Choose the architecture that aligns with your specific business needs and data characteristics.

8. Q&A

  • Open floor for questions.