Suggestion: Improve documentation structure and visual consistency across repository

[paulohenriquedev0]

Hello 👋

While carefully exploring the repository and its documentation, I noticed an opportunity that could further enhance clarity, onboarding flow, and overall visual consistency across the project.

1️⃣ Table of Contents Structure

Currently, the Table of Contents begins with announcements and events before the core project overview. For first-time visitors, it might be helpful to prioritize foundational sections first, such as:

Introduction

1. System Diagram

2. Datasets

3. AI Agents

4. Multi-Agent Frameworks

5. Docker Setup / Quick Start

6. Leaderboards

7. Talks & Events

8. External Resources

9. Contributors

This slight reordering could create a more intuitive flow:
understand → explore → run → evaluate → contribute

2️⃣ Visual Consistency Across Assets

I also noticed that several sections and folders (for example):

• aobench

• docs/tutorial

• README.md / Leaderboards

• README.md / External Resources

• README.md / ReActXen_IoT_Agent_EMNLP_2025

• docs/tutorial/AssetOpsBench_Technical_Material.pdf

contain images, slides, or PDFs with varying visual styles and formatting.

A possible improvement could be to:

• Standardize layout structure

• Improve visual hierarchy

• Align diagrams and slides with a more consistent design approach

• Use cleaner typography and spacing

• Harmonize overall presentation across documentation assets

This could strengthen readability and create a more unified and polished experience for researchers and industry users discovering the project.

If helpful, I’d be happy to create a sample layout/mockup demonstrating how the documentation and assets could look with a more consistent structure — keeping all original content unchanged, only improving layout and presentation.

Just sharing this as a constructive suggestion 🙂

Suggested label: documentation / enhancement

[DhavalRepo18]

@paulohenriquedev0 We are reworking on the MCP migration, and in that, we will incorporate some of the feedback you provided.

[DhavalRepo18]

@ShuxinLin, this may be a good read to see how we should organize our repo structure. Its 3rd-party view on how we can improve consumption.

[paulohenriquedev0]

Hi 👋

That’s great to hear — I really appreciate you considering the feedback during the MCP migration.

I’m glad a third-party perspective can be helpful in improving repository organization and overall consumption.

Happy to provide additional input if needed as the restructuring progresses 🙂