Our project welcomes external contributions. If you have an itch, please feel free to scratch it. Please ensure that you follow the Code of Conduct for any participation in the project.
To contribute code or documentation, please submit a pull request.
A good way to familiarize yourself with the codebase and contribution process is to look for and tackle low-hanging fruit in the issue tracker. Before embarking on a more ambitious contribution, please quickly get in touch with us.
Note: We appreciate your effort, and want to avoid a situation where a contribution requires extensive rework (by you or by us), sits in backlog for a long time, or cannot be accepted at all!
If you would like to implement a new feature, please raise an issue before sending a pull request so the feature can be discussed. This is to avoid you wasting your valuable time working on a feature that the project developers are not interested in accepting into the code base.
If you would like to fix a bug, please raise an issue before sending a pull request so it can be tracked.
The project maintainers use LGTM (Looks Good To Me) in comments on the code review to indicate acceptance. A change requires LGTMs from one of the maintainers of each component affected.
For a list of the maintainers, see the MAINTAINERS.md page.
For feature requests, bug reports or technical discussions, please use the issue tracker. Otherwise please contact one of the maintainers directly for general questions or feedback.
We encourage contributors to ensure that existing tests pass before submitting a pull request.
The CI pipeline is designed so that everything running on GitHub Actions can also be run locally:
# Run the full CI pipeline (same as GitHub Actions)
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/run_all.shEach CI step is an independent script that can be run separately:
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_format.sh # Check code formatting
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_build.sh # Build the project
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_test.sh # Run all tests
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_memcheck.sh # Run Valgrind memory checks
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_static_analysis.sh # Run static analysis
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_package.sh # Build RPM packagesIt is highly appreciated if you implement unit-tests for new code.
Clang Format is enforced for code formatting. Failure to adhere to this standard will result in a CI failure.
# Check formatting (same as CI)
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_format.sh
# Auto-format all files
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/development_helper/format_everything.shWe use clang-tidy and cppcheck for static analysis. While not currently blocking CI, we encourage fixing any issues found:
# Run all static analysis tools
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_static_analysis.sh --all
# Run clang-tidy with auto-fix
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_static_analysis.sh --clang-tidy --fix
# Analyze specific component
./scripts/container.sh ./scripts/ci-cd/step_static_analysis.sh --clang-tidy --filter decoder_toolConfiguration files:
.clang-tidy- clang-tidy checks configuration.clang-format- Code formatting rules.iwyu.imp- Include-what-you-use mappings
We are trying to stay close to Canonical Project Structure as described in this proposal. All new code should follow the directory and naming conventions described here.
For documenting code, please use the doxygen style method 3. For example to document a method:
/// Method for doing my stuff.
/// This method is doing my stuff by doing ....
myMethod()
...
Each source file must include a license header for the:
Copyright (c) <YEAR> <COPYRIGHT HOLDERS>
SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
We have tried to make it as easy as possible to make contributions. This applies to how we handle the legal aspects of contribution. We use the same approach - the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 (DCO) - that the Linux® Kernel community uses to manage code contributions.
We simply ask that when submitting a patch for review, the developer must include a sign-off statement in the commit message.
Here is an example Signed-off-by line, which indicates that the submitter accepts the DCO:
Signed-off-by: John Doe <john.doe@example.com>
You can include this automatically when you commit a change to your local git repository using the following command:
git commit -s