Skip to content

stars, watchers, subscribers confusion #37

@pdurbin

Description

@pdurbin

Confusingly, "stars" and "watchers" are always the same number:

stars	watchers	repo
1120	1120	https://github.com/cs50/libcs50
732	732	https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse

http://developer.github.com/changes/2012-9-5-watcher-api/ via https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/24795 explains that if you want what the GitHub UI calls watchers you should use subscribers_count instead.

So we can get different numbers like this:

stars	watchers	repo
1120	138	https://github.com/cs50/libcs50
732	66	https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse

... with the following change:

$ git diff
diff --git a/parse.go b/parse.go
index 49b3fc2..8f35564 100644
--- a/parse.go
+++ b/parse.go
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ type Repo struct {
        OpenIssues int       `json:"open_issues_count"`
        Size       int       `json:"size"`
        Forks      int       `json:"forks_count"`
-       Watchers   int       `json:"watchers_count"`
+       Watchers   int       `json:"subscribers_count"`
        PushedAt   time.Time `json:"pushed_at"`
        CreatedAt  time.Time `json:"created_at"`
        Desc       string    `json:"description"`

However, is this a good idea? Old versions of the data will have the old meaning for "watchers" (same as stars) while new versions of the data will have a new meaning for "watchers" (subscribers). Perhaps we should introduce a new column called "subscribers" and drop the "watchers" column.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions