🎨 Improve Exception Context to diagnose Invalid Invitations links

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR adds more contextual information to exceptions related to invalid invitations. The goal is to enhance logging output, making it easier to diagnose the root cause of such issues directly from the logs, without needing to inspect the codebase. Initial log review below revealed insufficient details, prompting this improvement.

Related issue/s

• support email by user

How to test

None

Dev-ops

NOne

[pcrespov]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🟠 Waiting for conditions to match

• -closed [📌 queue requirement]
• -conflict [📌 queue requirement]
• -draft [📌 queue requirement]
• any of: [📌 queue -> configuration change requirements]
  • -mergify-configuration-changed
  • check-success = Configuration changed
• any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
  • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default]
    • #approved-reviews-by >= 2 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #approved-reviews-by>=2
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #changes-requested-reviews-by=0
    • #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • #review-threads-unresolved=0
    • -conflict
    • -draft
    • base=master
    • branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
    • label!=🤖-do-not-merge
    • label=🤖-automerge
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-skipped = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-neutral = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-success = deploy to dockerhub
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = system-tests
      • check-neutral = system-tests
      • check-skipped = system-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = unit-tests
      • check-neutral = unit-tests
      • check-skipped = unit-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-neutral = check OAS' are up to date
      • check-skipped = check OAS' are up to date
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = integration-tests
      • check-neutral = integration-tests
      • check-skipped = integration-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-success = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-neutral = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images
      • check-skipped = build-test-images (frontend) / build-test-images

[odeimaiz]

Thanks 👍

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.17%. Comparing base (1d5454a) to head (b3cda53).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7727      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.37%   87.17%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files        1838     1430     -408     
  Lines       71155    59550   -11605     
  Branches     1201      604     -597     
==========================================
- Hits        62170    51912   -10258     
+ Misses       8655     7450    -1205     
+ Partials      330      188     -142     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.47% <50.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests	86.24% <75.00%> (-0.35%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	72.20% <ø> (ø)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.89% <ø> (-0.18%)	⬇️
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	91.58% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.07% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.29% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.25% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.67% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	98.12% <ø> (ø)
director	76.78% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	90.99% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	96.76% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.18% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.79% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.63% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.13% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️
storage	87.56% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	85.72% <75.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d5454a...b3cda53. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud