♻️ Extract async_jobs RPC routes from simcore_service_storage

[giancarloromeo]

What do these changes do?

This PR follows #7698 refactoring the async_jobs RPC routes and moving them to celery-library: this will allow a re-use for any other service that wants to monitor the new distributed queue tasks.

Related issue/s

• resolves Move async_jobs routes out from simcore_service_storage #7930

How to test

cd packages/celery-library
pytest -vv --pdb tests/unit/test_async_jobs.py

Dev-ops

• Nothing to do

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.68%. Comparing base (2f1b484) to head (80b39ec).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7988      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.83%   87.68%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1805     1249     -556     
  Lines       69606    53181   -16425     
  Branches     1254      203    -1051     
==========================================
- Hits        61135    46630   -14505     
+ Misses       8106     6485    -1621     
+ Partials      365       66     -299     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.23% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	85.77% <100.00%> (-0.63%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_celery_library	87.15% <100.00%> (+6.07%)	⬆️
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.99% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
agent	96.29% <ø> (ø)
api_server	92.64% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.03% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.29% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.13% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	92.35% <ø> (+0.22%)	⬆️
datcore_adapter	97.94% <ø> (ø)
director	76.82% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
director_v2	91.01% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	96.69% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.09% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.65% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.60% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.57% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.10% <ø> (∅)
storage	86.36% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	82.42% <ø> (-5.26%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f1b484...80b39ec. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[bisgaard-itis]

Nice solution! Thanks

[sanderegg]

thanks!

[pcrespov]

thx

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud