♻️Maintenance: fix generation of service names

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

sometimes the faker generate words like a which cannot be used safely as docker service names...

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

A maintenance refactor that fixes service name generation by replacing the word-based suffix with a more controlled string generation approach.

• Changed suffix generation from fake.unique.word() to fake.unique.pystr(min_chars=2) to ensure consistent service name format

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.91%. Comparing base (c6d5810) to head (751f5b7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8377   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.90%   87.91%           
=======================================
  Files        1951     1951           
  Lines       75927    75927           
  Branches     1337     1337           
=======================================
+ Hits        66745    66750    +5     
+ Misses       8783     8778    -5     
  Partials      399      399           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	63.97% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	86.58% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	93.59% <ø> (ø)
pkg_celery_library	83.58% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	79.33% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	93.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	85.20% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	87.95% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.19% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.58% <ø> (ø)
pkg_settings_library	90.19% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	84.99% <ø> (ø)
agent	93.53% <ø> (ø)
api_server	91.93% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	95.78% <ø> (ø)
catalog	92.36% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.13% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	92.37% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	97.94% <ø> (ø)
director	75.81% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	90.98% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	96.27% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	90.46% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	89.62% <ø> (ø)
invitations	91.44% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.62% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	92.18% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️
storage	86.83% <ø> (+0.16%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	87.96% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c6d5810...751f5b7. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sanderegg]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🛑 Configuration not compatible with a branch protection setting

The branch protection setting Require branches to be up to date before merging is not compatible with max_parallel_checks>1, queue_conditions != merge_conditions and must be unset.

[pcrespov]

thx

[mergify]

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 751f5b7.

✅ Passed Jobs With Interesting Signals

Pipeline	Job	Signal	Health on master	Retries	🔍 CI Insights	📄 Logs
CI	unit-tests	Base branch is broken, but the job passed. Looks like this might be a real fix 💪		0	View	View