Skip to content

Conversation

@ogauthe
Copy link
Collaborator

@ogauthe ogauthe commented Jun 17, 2025

This PR adapts FusionTensors to GradedArrays 'v0.4'. All tests are now passing. The next step is to define FusionTensorAxes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.41%. Comparing base (d891cbb) to head (6867690).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/fusiontensor/base_interface.jl 37.50% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/fusion_trees/fusiontree.jl 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #56      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.03%   90.41%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         532      532              
==========================================
+ Hits          479      481       +2     
+ Misses         53       51       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

Looks good, nice to see this updated.

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 7ccd853 into ITensor:main Jun 18, 2025
13 checks passed
@ogauthe ogauthe deleted the GradedArrays0.4 branch June 18, 2025 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants