Skip to content

Conversation

@corbett5
Copy link

@corbett5
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the delay to move it here.

@corbett5
Copy link
Author

@mtfishman If I resolve the merge conflicts can this be merged?

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

@mtfishman If I resolve the merge conflicts can this be merged?

Sure, though I have some review comments. Go ahead and fix the merge conflicts and then I'll do a review.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Your PR no longer requires formatting changes. Thank you for your contribution!

@corbett5
Copy link
Author

corbett5 commented Dec 8, 2025

@mtfishman up to date and the tests are passing locally so I think it's good for your review.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (0d4137a) to head (7167279).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #97      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.31%   90.33%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        3604     3610       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         3255     3261       +6     
  Misses        349      349              
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 17.95% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants