|
| 1 | +import unittest |
| 2 | +from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch |
| 3 | +from . import Web3Advanced |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +class TestWeb3AdvancedGetLogs(unittest.TestCase): |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | + @classmethod |
| 9 | + def setUpClass(cls): |
| 10 | + # Instantiate the class only once |
| 11 | + cls.eth_advanced = Web3Advanced(node_url="https://rpc-core.icecreamswap.com").eth |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + def setUp(self): |
| 14 | + # Mock self.eth_advanced.w3 and its properties |
| 15 | + self.eth_advanced.w3 = MagicMock() |
| 16 | + self.eth_advanced.w3.filter_block_range = 1000 # Set a default filter block range |
| 17 | + self.eth_advanced.w3.unstable_blocks = 10 # Set default unstable blocks |
| 18 | + self.eth_advanced.w3.latest_seen_block = 1000 # Set the latest seen block |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + # Mock get_block_number |
| 21 | + self.eth_advanced.get_block_number = MagicMock(return_value=1000) |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + # Mock get_block |
| 24 | + def mock_get_block(block_identifier, no_retry=False): |
| 25 | + if isinstance(block_identifier, int): |
| 26 | + block_number = block_identifier |
| 27 | + elif block_identifier == 'latest': |
| 28 | + block_number = 1000 |
| 29 | + else: |
| 30 | + # Handle other block identifiers as needed |
| 31 | + block_number = None |
| 32 | + if block_number is None: |
| 33 | + raise Exception(f"Invalid block identifier: {block_identifier}") |
| 34 | + block_hash = f"hash_{block_number}" |
| 35 | + parent_hash = f"hash_{block_number - 1}" if block_number > 0 else None |
| 36 | + return {'number': block_number, 'hash': block_hash, 'parentHash': parent_hash} |
| 37 | + self.eth_advanced.get_block = MagicMock(side_effect=mock_get_block) |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + # Mock _get_logs |
| 40 | + self.logs_storage = {} # To simulate storage of logs per block |
| 41 | + def mock__get_logs(filter_params): |
| 42 | + if 'blockHash' in filter_params: |
| 43 | + # Single block query |
| 44 | + block_number = int(filter_params['blockHash'].split('_')[1]) |
| 45 | + logs = self.logs_storage.get(block_number, []) |
| 46 | + return logs |
| 47 | + else: |
| 48 | + from_block = filter_params.get('fromBlock', 0) |
| 49 | + to_block = filter_params.get('toBlock', 0) |
| 50 | + logs = [] |
| 51 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 52 | + block_logs = self.logs_storage.get(block_number, []) |
| 53 | + logs.extend(block_logs) |
| 54 | + return logs |
| 55 | + self.eth_advanced._get_logs = MagicMock(side_effect=mock__get_logs) |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + def test_get_logs_no_duplicates_no_missing_blocks_correct_order(self): |
| 58 | + # Prepare test data |
| 59 | + from_block = 900 |
| 60 | + to_block = 950 |
| 61 | + filter_params = {'fromBlock': from_block, 'toBlock': to_block} |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + # Simulate logs for each block |
| 64 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 65 | + self.logs_storage[block_number] = [{'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}] |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + # Call get_logs |
| 68 | + logs = self.eth_advanced.get_logs(filter_params, use_subsquid=False) |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + # Collect block numbers from logs |
| 71 | + actual_block_numbers = [log['blockNumber'] for log in logs] |
| 72 | + expected_block_numbers = list(range(from_block, to_block + 1)) |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + # Assertions |
| 75 | + self.assertEqual(len(actual_block_numbers), len(set(actual_block_numbers)), "Duplicate logs found") |
| 76 | + self.assertEqual(sorted(actual_block_numbers), expected_block_numbers, "Missing or extra logs found") |
| 77 | + self.assertEqual(actual_block_numbers, expected_block_numbers, "Logs are not in correct order") |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | + def test_get_logs_range_exceeds_filter_block_range(self): |
| 80 | + # Adjust filter_block_range to force splitting |
| 81 | + self.eth_advanced.w3.filter_block_range = 10 |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | + # Prepare test data |
| 84 | + from_block = 50 |
| 85 | + to_block = 100 |
| 86 | + filter_params = {'fromBlock': from_block, 'toBlock': to_block} |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + # Simulate logs for each block |
| 89 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 90 | + self.logs_storage[block_number] = [{'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}] |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + # Call get_logs |
| 93 | + logs = self.eth_advanced.get_logs(filter_params, use_subsquid=False) |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + # Collect block numbers from logs |
| 96 | + actual_block_numbers = [log['blockNumber'] for log in logs] |
| 97 | + expected_block_numbers = list(range(from_block, to_block + 1)) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + # Assertions |
| 100 | + self.assertEqual(len(actual_block_numbers), len(set(actual_block_numbers)), "Duplicate logs found") |
| 101 | + self.assertEqual(sorted(actual_block_numbers), expected_block_numbers, "Missing or extra logs found") |
| 102 | + self.assertEqual(actual_block_numbers, expected_block_numbers, "Logs are not in correct order") |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + def test_get_logs_splits_on_error(self): |
| 105 | + # Prepare test data |
| 106 | + from_block = 50 |
| 107 | + to_block = 100 |
| 108 | + filter_params = {'fromBlock': from_block, 'toBlock': to_block} |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 111 | + self.logs_storage[block_number] = [{'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}] |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | + # Simulate logs for each block except when more than 10 logs are requested, then raise exception |
| 114 | + def mock__get_logs(filter_params): |
| 115 | + from_block = filter_params.get('fromBlock', 0) |
| 116 | + to_block = filter_params.get('toBlock', 0) |
| 117 | + if to_block - from_block + 1 > 10: |
| 118 | + raise Exception("Simulated RPC error") |
| 119 | + logs = [] |
| 120 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 121 | + logs.extend(self.logs_storage.get(block_number, [])) |
| 122 | + return logs |
| 123 | + self.eth_advanced._get_logs.side_effect = mock__get_logs |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + # Call get_logs |
| 126 | + logs = self.eth_advanced.get_logs(filter_params, use_subsquid=False) |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + # Collect block numbers from logs |
| 129 | + actual_block_numbers = [log['blockNumber'] for log in logs] |
| 130 | + expected_block_numbers = list(range(from_block, to_block + 1)) |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | + # Assertions |
| 133 | + self.assertEqual(len(actual_block_numbers), len(set(actual_block_numbers)), "Duplicate logs found") |
| 134 | + self.assertEqual(sorted(actual_block_numbers), expected_block_numbers, "Missing or extra logs found") |
| 135 | + self.assertEqual(actual_block_numbers, expected_block_numbers, "Logs are not in correct order") |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | + @patch('IceCreamSwapWeb3.EthAdvanced.get_filter') |
| 138 | + def test_get_logs_uses_subsquid(self, mock_get_filter): |
| 139 | + # Prepare test data |
| 140 | + from_block = 800 |
| 141 | + to_block = 850 |
| 142 | + filter_params = {'fromBlock': from_block, 'toBlock': to_block} |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + for block_number in range(to_block - 10, to_block + 1): |
| 145 | + self.logs_storage[block_number] = [{'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}] |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + # Simulate logs returned by get_filter |
| 148 | + def mock_get_filter_func(chain_id, filter_params, partial_allowed, p_bar): |
| 149 | + till_block = to_block - 10 |
| 150 | + logs = [] |
| 151 | + for block_number in range(from_block, till_block + 1): |
| 152 | + logs.append({'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}) |
| 153 | + return till_block, logs |
| 154 | + mock_get_filter.side_effect = mock_get_filter_func |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + # Call get_logs with use_subsquid=True |
| 157 | + logs = self.eth_advanced.get_logs(filter_params, use_subsquid=True) |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | + # Collect block numbers from logs |
| 160 | + actual_block_numbers = [log['blockNumber'] for log in logs] |
| 161 | + expected_block_numbers = list(range(from_block, to_block + 1)) |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | + # Assertions |
| 164 | + self.assertEqual(len(actual_block_numbers), len(set(actual_block_numbers)), "Duplicate logs found") |
| 165 | + self.assertEqual(sorted(actual_block_numbers), expected_block_numbers, "Missing or extra logs found") |
| 166 | + self.assertEqual(actual_block_numbers, expected_block_numbers, "Logs are not in correct order") |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | + def test_get_logs_unstable_blocks_handling(self): |
| 169 | + # Prepare test data where to_block is within the latest unstable blocks |
| 170 | + unstable_blocks = self.eth_advanced.w3.unstable_blocks |
| 171 | + latest_block = self.eth_advanced.get_block_number() |
| 172 | + from_block = latest_block - unstable_blocks - 5 |
| 173 | + to_block = latest_block # This will be within the unstable blocks |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | + filter_params = {'fromBlock': from_block, 'toBlock': to_block} |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | + # Simulate logs for each block |
| 178 | + for block_number in range(from_block, to_block + 1): |
| 179 | + self.logs_storage[block_number] = [{'blockNumber': block_number, 'logIndex': 0}] |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | + # Ensure get_block returns consistent block hashes and parent hashes |
| 182 | + def mock_get_block(block_identifier, no_retry=False): |
| 183 | + if isinstance(block_identifier, int): |
| 184 | + block_number = block_identifier |
| 185 | + elif block_identifier == 'latest': |
| 186 | + block_number = latest_block |
| 187 | + else: |
| 188 | + # Handle other block identifiers as needed |
| 189 | + block_number = None |
| 190 | + if block_number is None: |
| 191 | + raise Exception(f"Invalid block identifier: {block_identifier}") |
| 192 | + block_hash = f"hash_{block_number}" |
| 193 | + parent_hash = f"hash_{block_number - 1}" if block_number > 0 else None |
| 194 | + return {'number': block_number, 'hash': block_hash, 'parentHash': parent_hash} |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | + self.eth_advanced.get_block.side_effect = mock_get_block |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | + # Mock get_logs_inner to simulate fetching logs by blockHash |
| 199 | + def mock_get_logs_inner(filter_params, no_retry=False): |
| 200 | + block_hash = filter_params.get('blockHash') |
| 201 | + if block_hash: |
| 202 | + block_number = int(block_hash.split('_')[1]) |
| 203 | + return self.logs_storage.get(block_number, []) |
| 204 | + else: |
| 205 | + return [] |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | + self.eth_advanced.get_logs_inner = MagicMock(side_effect=mock_get_logs_inner) |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | + # Call get_logs |
| 210 | + logs = self.eth_advanced.get_logs(filter_params, use_subsquid=False) |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + # Collect block numbers from logs |
| 213 | + actual_block_numbers = [log['blockNumber'] for log in logs] |
| 214 | + expected_block_numbers = list(range(from_block, to_block + 1)) |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | + # Assertions |
| 217 | + self.assertEqual(len(actual_block_numbers), len(set(actual_block_numbers)), "Duplicate logs found") |
| 218 | + self.assertEqual(sorted(actual_block_numbers), expected_block_numbers, "Missing or extra logs found") |
| 219 | + self.assertEqual(actual_block_numbers, expected_block_numbers, "Logs are not in correct order") |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +if __name__ == '__main__': |
| 223 | + unittest.main() |
0 commit comments