You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: notebooks/collections_demos/nlst_exploration.ipynb
+10-10Lines changed: 10 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
28
28
"* [BAMF-AIMI-Annotations](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8345959): AI-based volumetric segmentations for a small subset of the CT images\n",
29
29
"* [nnU-Net-BPR-annotations](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7473970): AI-based annotation of the body part and volumetric segmentations of chest organs using [nnUNet](https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet) package\n",
30
30
"\n",
31
-
"A user of IDC asked the following question:\n",
31
+
"A user of IDC asked the following question in [this IDC forum post](https://discourse.canceridc.dev/t/dataset-size-discrepancies-cancerimagearchives-vs-idc/629):\n",
32
32
"\n",
33
33
"\n",
34
34
"> _Our lab is interested in downloading all the NLST dataset. We are interested in mirroring the data onto our cluster. However, there is some confusion about how much space the data takes. On the cancerimagearchive page for the NLST, it states that the DICOM takes 11.14TB, while on the IDC platform, it shows that the NLST takes 23.95TB. Would you be able to clarify which is more accurate?_\n",
0 commit comments