You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: patterns/2-structured/maturity-model.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ InnerSource projects need a means for self assessment. Metrics can be one aspect
175
175
176
176
Not only should feature development be owned by InnerSource teams - support and maintenance is also part of the teams core tasks.
177
177
178
-
*SP-0: Support given by the core dev or support team. A business contract guaranties the support. There is no knowledge about the product outside the team.
179
-
*SP-1: There are rules and regulations to formalize the support on the product, given by a dedicated supporting team.
180
-
*SP-2: Support for InnerSource contributions is formalized through InnerSource patterns like [30 Day Warranty](./30-day-warranty.md) or [Service vs. Library](./service-vs-library.md).
181
-
*SP-3: There are rules and regulations to formalize the support on the product, given by a mature community.
178
+
*SM-0: Support given by the core dev or support team. A business contract guaranties the support. There is no knowledge about the product outside the team.
179
+
*SM-1: There are rules and regulations to formalize the support on the product, given by a dedicated supporting team.
180
+
*SM-2: Support for InnerSource contributions is formalized through InnerSource patterns like [30 Day Warranty](./30-day-warranty.md) or [Service vs. Library](./service-vs-library.md).
181
+
*SM-3: There are rules and regulations to formalize the support on the product, given by a mature community.
0 commit comments