Skip to content

Commit 863ef50

Browse files
committed
Remove irrelevant caveat- the classic provider did not include hub names in the table names, so there can't be conflicts.
1 parent 00468fd commit 863ef50

File tree

1 file changed

+0
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+0
-2
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 0 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ services.Configure<SqlServerOptions>(Configuration.GetSection("SignalR:SqlServer
7979

8080
As mentioned above, if SQL Server Service Broker is not available, messages will not always be transmitted immediately since a fallback of periodic querying must be used.
8181

82-
While this uses the same table schema as the classic ASP.NET SignalR SQL Server backplane, the message payloads are completely different. If you are migrating, consider configuring a different `SchemaName` to prevent conflicts.
83-
8482
### Performance
8583

8684
This is not the right solution for applications with a need for very high throughput, or very high degrees of scale-out. Consider Redis or Azure SignalR Service instead for such cases. You should always do an appropriate amount of testing to determine if a particular solution is suitable for your application.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)