Skip to content

Feedback for “Appendix C: The MIND Dashboard: A Practitioner's Guide” #16

@wesleybruce

Description

@wesleybruce

I like the framework but there is a trap here if you want to win over conservatives. Economic, political and Christian conservatives almost all reject the Data Sources you list as flawed or outright tyrants clubs. The Academia, UN, OECD, World Bank, etc have all attacked conservatism. Speedtest Global Index is the only neutral entity listed.

You probably need to avoid the green house carbon references too since the only real green house problem conservatives see is the lack of jailtime for fraudulent climatologists.
Yes, I argued with one of the University of East Angle people when he visited Australia. He lied openly to 600 students and teachers. None of the models worked. Read the climate gate emails. That was a whistle blower ordered to illegally delete emails not a hack.

There are, in almost all cases, a conservative entity that can be added to the list but it will need some work. I'll look at it.

This is a fundamental challenge to all AI. Bias in data sources added because the programmer themselves are programmed to see only one valid set of data sources. You see this with GDP but not with the World Economic Forum or Reporters without borders because you have probably never seen the scandals.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions