More easy run

[koppor]

With JabRef/jabref#13189 and eirikb/gg#112 it's now even more easy to try out things:

.\gg.cmd just run-pr 13182

[koppor]

Users need to manually type 1 and enter for trust.

Should we change that to

.\gg.cmd jbang trust add https://github.com/JabRef/jabref

?

[subhramit]

Users need to manually type 1 and enter for trust.

2, you mean? Here, we mentioned 2 (otherwise this recurs I guess)

Should we change that to

.\gg.cmd jbang trust add https://github.com/JabRef/jabref

?

Yes, this reduces one step - we should.

[koppor]

Yes, this reduces one step - we should.

However, it adds one step - but maybe the text is more easy to write?

[koppor]

Users need to manually type 1 and enter for trust.
2, you mean? Here, we mentioned 2 (otherwise this recurs I guess)

I meant there JabRef/blog.jabref.org#115

2. JBang will ask for trust - please trust the script with <kbd>2</kbd> and then <kbd>Enter</kbd>

[subhramit]

Yes, this reduces one step - we should.

However, it adds one step - but maybe the text is more easy to write?

Oh I misinterpreted this to be the initial command. No, trusting with 2 and enter is fine then

[koppor]

Oh I misinterpreted this to be the initial command. No, trusting with 2 and enter is fine then

Oh, I updated it to explicit "trust" at JabRef/blog.jabref.org#115

Let's see, what you like more :)

Since JBang needs some seconds to start initially and has a timeout of 30 seconds for the answer, I sometimes miss that...

[koppor]

First, we should get JabRef/blog.jabref.org#115 ready, then we can "finish" this part of the documentation.

[subhramit]

Let's see, what you like more :)

So, I liked the old one more because when prompted, I as a user, even without explicit instruction would choose to trust. In the explicit instruction too, it is more of a "follow-through" sub-step when I am told to press 2 and enter. Adding the trust command is a new step in itself.
But this at the end is just nitpick, another user can like the other more so I would say good to go.