Replies: 3 comments
-
ok, as I opened the issue I was not aware that we are actually doing ~4000
does not generate the stack overflow luckily. Still, I would be very interested to hear opinions if the OP is considered a bug or a legitimate limitation (which IMHO should still be documented in the gremlin reference)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ok I just found out in the tinkerpop reference, that it is not possible to provide an array / list of values in a Anyhow, this also means that above workaround is not possible and the current implementation definitively is a bug IMHO. Another workaround might be to split the addition of propery values into multiple traversers, sth like this:
Haven't tested if it works, anyhow it is quite unconvenient, and also impossible to know the exact value of x ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
TinkerPop uses Jira as an issue tracker. You can post your TinkerPop found issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TINKERPOP/issues/. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Running this gremlin query inside JRuby:
results in:
For a list of size ~4000.
Not sure if this is a gremlin issue or a JanusGraph issue. Anyway the apache tinkerpop github repo does not have an issue tracker, so I would be very grateful if this is a gremlin issue to get advise where to post the issue.
best
EDIT: Sorry wrong point in source code
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions