FoundationDB as Storage Backend: still feasible and advisable ? #3640
Replies: 1 comment
-
You've posted the same question in three different places: JanusGraph/janusgraph-foundationdb#62, #1048 (comment) and here. Please don't do that. It won't make it more likely that you get a response, but it will annoy people following the project as they now get three notifications for the same issue instead of one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm interested to know the state of the JanusGraph-FoundationDB Storage Adapter:
4 years ago it was announced : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQM_ZPZy8Ck&list=PLU8TPe7k8z9ew5W6YpACnGvjBDYaJVORZ&index=1
and, according to the
README
: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph-foundationdb the storage adapter is compatible only for theJanusGraph
version0.5.2
withFoundationDB
version6.2.22
, while the latestJanusGraph
version is0.6.3
and the latestFoundationDB
version is7.2
(https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/ )Since I don' see
, and there is no official JanusGraph documentation about FoundationDB as Backend Storage,
FoundationDB
listed in storage backendsI would like to know if it is still feasible, and, more importantly, advisable, to use
FoundationDB
asstorage backend
forJanusGraph
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions