Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Thanks for trying out the new feature! I appreciate your testing before we officially release it. Yes, what you found is right - we certainly missed testing log processors. Do you want to contribute a patch? If not, I would fix it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Closing since this is working well now! Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi! I'm currently switching our team's code to take advantage of the string ID support added with PR #3418.
I'm wondering if it's possible that this line would need to switch to use
IDHandler.readVertexId
? I updated to use string ids and now get errors from a log processor that had previously been running fine. I added the error I'm seeing below:I can debug further if this is unrelated, but wanted to see if that would explain the issue before going too far down a rabbit hole.
I also noticed that Modification still has outVertexId as a long.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions