Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

@borbiuk Please don't use GitHub issues for questions. Either try Discord, or Discussions I guess, but we don't check that as often.

No to all your bullet points, it's not something that's really ever come up. But:

  • adding the ability to configure the ServiceBusProcessor objects would be a simple pull request
  • You could instead use Durable endpoints in Wolverine where the message is ack'd immediately, but tracked in Wolverine's transactional inbox for durability
  • I would very strongly recommend against doing a long lived workflow like that anyway and I'd recommend breaking it up into smaller steps anyway -- which is pretty easy to do w/ Wolverine's programming model

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by jeremydmiller
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #2110 on February 04, 2026 17:40.