You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<sub> <b> Figure 1. </b> 60-second epoch RAR data with fitted antilogistic cosine model (red). Top right: residuals estimated from the fitted anti-logistic model. </sub>
15
15
<br>
16
16
17
17
See <ahref = "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sim.2466">Marler et al. 2006</a> for a summary of the model structure and parameters estimated from the models.
<sub> <b> Figure 2. </b> Top left: 60-second epoch RAR data with fitted antilogistic cosine model (red). Top right: residuals estimated from the fitted anti-logistic model. Bottom left: estimated log power spectrum of the residuals from the top right panel with a smoothing cubic spline (blue). Bottom right: example of frequency band selection (a, b) to estimate frequency band score.</sub><br>
23
23
<br>
24
24
Spectral analysis is performed on the residuals of derived from the anti-logistic extended cosine model. From there, a user-specified band (a, c) for which the area under the smoothed spectrum is estimated.
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ See <a href = "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12561-018-09230-2"> Kr
<sub> <b> Figure 3. </b> Example of mean and SD of activity estiamted using RAR_Local function. Mean and standard deviation of daily log activity counts stratified by the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) at 4-h time bin intervals. Solid line represents greater perceived physical fatigability (PFS ≥ 15); dotted line represents lesser perceived physical fatigability (PFS < 15). <i>Taken from <ahref = "https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/5/1718">Graves et al. 2021, Sensors</a></i> </sub>
0 commit comments