Hi, I really liked/like your work, and this lazy idea, that I believe I may have heard of it first related to your package. I'm not disrespecting your work. I just believe JSON3.jl is well tested by now, and know it came later, and your and JSON.jl are pre-1.0 (I made similar suggestion there).

Is you fully supported, and better in some way?

https://discourse.julialang.org/t/announce-a-different-way-to-read-json-data-lazyjson-jl/9046

@quinnj, FYI (not a huge concern, I doubt many would use both at once): In my 1-day master, JSON3 loads a tiny bit faster, and combined almost as fast if loaded in reverse order, but with this order loading your first penalizes JSON3 a lot:

julia> @time using LazyJSON
  0.155977 seconds (167.09 k allocations: 16.904 MiB, 15.58% compilation time)

julia> @time using JSON3
  1.986343 seconds (3.24 M allocations: 176.131 MiB, 2.88% gc time, 99.03% compilation time)