-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
After merging the pull request #127 (that solves #111) it is probably worthwhile to think about whether the NonlinearSolver (and analogously for the Optimizer) and the Linesearch should both store an instance of Options?
After merging #127 we have:
SimpleSolvers.jl/src/base/options.jl
Lines 140 to 165 in 24d1be6
| struct Options{T} | |
| x_abstol::T | |
| x_reltol::T | |
| x_suctol::T | |
| f_abstol::T | |
| f_reltol::T | |
| f_suctol::T | |
| f_mindec::T | |
| g_restol::T | |
| x_abstol_break::T | |
| x_reltol_break::T | |
| f_abstol_break::T | |
| f_reltol_break::T | |
| g_restol_break::T | |
| allow_f_increases::Bool | |
| min_iterations::Int | |
| max_iterations::Int | |
| warn_iterations::Int | |
| show_trace::Bool | |
| store_trace::Bool | |
| extended_trace::Bool | |
| show_every::Int | |
| verbosity::Int | |
| linesearch_nan_max_iterations::Int | |
| linesearch_nan_factor::T | |
| end |
allocating this once is probably enough?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels