You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed 3 things: 1) HeteroGraphConv is not available in GNNLux (although available in GraphNeuralNetworks.jl). Any reason? 2) HeteroGraphConv considers the subgraphs corresponding to the edge types and performs graph convolutions on these. There is an implicit assumption that the source and target data will have the same dimension, which is almost never the case for a heterogenous graph. Finally, 3) I don't see a convenient way of incorporating edge data in the convolutions for heterogenous graphs. The current implementation just extracts node data. I know I could implement custom layers using message passing, but it seems to me these are fairly generic things one would expect. Am I missing something? Thanks in advance and apologies if I misunderstood the current state of the code.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I noticed 3 things: 1) HeteroGraphConv is not available in GNNLux (although available in GraphNeuralNetworks.jl). Any reason? 2) HeteroGraphConv considers the subgraphs corresponding to the edge types and performs graph convolutions on these. There is an implicit assumption that the source and target data will have the same dimension, which is almost never the case for a heterogenous graph. Finally, 3) I don't see a convenient way of incorporating edge data in the convolutions for heterogenous graphs. The current implementation just extracts node data. I know I could implement custom layers using message passing, but it seems to me these are fairly generic things one would expect. Am I missing something? Thanks in advance and apologies if I misunderstood the current state of the code.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions