One more backport for Julia 1.11.8 #60045
Merged
+3
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
) Stdlib: Pkg URL: https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl.git Stdlib branch: release-1.11 Julia branch: backports-release-1.11 Old commit: 5b3ff389a New commit: 820b7f82f Julia version: 1.11.7 Pkg version: 1.11.0 (Does not match) Bump invoked by: @DilumAluthge Powered by: [BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl) Diff: JuliaLang/Pkg.jl@5b3ff38...820b7f8 ``` $ git log --oneline 5b3ff389a..820b7f82f 820b7f82f Increase version of `StaticArrays` in `why` tests (#4077) (#4489) ``` Co-authored-by: DilumAluthge <[email protected]>
|
Buildkite CI is all green, and as I mentioned above, I don't think we need a new PkgEval run here. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This only includes one backport:
The only thing being backported here is a fix to the Pkg test suite (no changes to the Pkg source code), so I don't think we need another PkgEval run here (since PkgEval was clean on #59521).