You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: paper/paper.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ The subproblem solver is **R2**.
175
175
176
176
\input{examples/Benchmark.tex}
177
177
178
-
- Note that for the LM solver, gradient evaluations count $\#\nabla f$ equals the number of Jacobian–vector and adjoint-Jacobian–vector products.
178
+
- Note that for the **LM** and **LMTR** solvers, gradient evaluations count $\#\nabla f$ equals the number of Jacobian–vector and adjoint-Jacobian–vector products.
179
179
180
180
All methods successfully reduced the optimality measure below the specified tolerance of $10^{-4}$, and thus converged to an approximate first-order stationary point.
181
181
Note that, the final objective values differ due to the nonconvexity of the problems.
0 commit comments