New Modeling Command Dialogs Instead of Individual Args

[pierremtb]

Example from Onshape:

This will replace this arg-by-arg command palette pattern that we have today and doesn't scale to the long list of optional arguments that we have in Extrude for instance.

Relevant for #8303 and #8017.

What we discussed live with @franknoirot:

1. Gather the current argument sets from KCL functions
2. List out patterns to support
3. Figure out the config api and if we could derive at least some parts or the simple parts from Rust directly
4. Design mock ups based on patterns
5. Implement and shippppp

[pierremtb]

Non exhaustive list of valid sets of kwargs for extrude in extrude.rs:

Common to all, mutually exclusive:

• tolerance?
• tag_start?
• tag_end?
• method?

One length:

• length

One length, symmetric:

• length
• symmetric

Two lengths:

• length
• bidirectional_length

Twist args, optional component to all the above:

• twist_angle
• twist_angle_step?
• twist_center?

To reference:

• to

[pierremtb]

Non exhaustive list of valid sets of kwargs for hole in hole.kcl from #8530

Top-level takes in a solid, then these kwargs

• face
• cutAt: relative coordinates to cut the hole in the face at
• holeBottom: hole::drilled or hole::flat
• holeBody: hole::blind (or later probably hole::trough)
• holeType: hole::simple, hole::counterbore, hole::countersink