Skip to content

Commit 5d3d49f

Browse files
committed
Open-ended ranges and rangeUntil operator KEEP
1 parent b4a2038 commit 5d3d49f

File tree

1 file changed

+231
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+231
-0
lines changed

proposals/open-ended-ranges.md

Lines changed: 231 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
1+
# Open-ended ranges and rangeUntil operator
2+
3+
* **Type**: Design proposal / Standard Library API proposal
4+
* **Author**: Ilya Gorbunov
5+
* **Contributors**: Roman Elizarov, Vsevolod Tolstopyatov, Abduqodiri Qurbonzoda, Leonid Startsev, Egor Tolstoy
6+
* **Status**: Experimental
7+
* **Prototype**: Implemented in 1.7.20-Beta
8+
* **Related issues**: [KT-15613](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-15613)
9+
* **Discussion**: [KEEP-314](https://github.com/Kotlin/KEEP/issues/314)
10+
11+
## Summary
12+
13+
Kotlin since its beginning has the `..` operator to express a range of values.
14+
Similar to natural languages, the expression `a..b` means the range that includes both of its bounds.
15+
16+
However, in programming it's often the case that a typical data structure has its indices starting at 0
17+
and ending one before the number of elements in it, so to iterate these indices, the range `0..(size - 1)` has to be used.
18+
For such a common use case, Kotlin standard library provides various shortcut functions, such as
19+
the `indices` extension property available on many data structures returning that `0..(size - 1)` range,
20+
the `lastIndex` extension property returning the last index value, namely `size - 1`, and finally the `until` infix function
21+
allowing to instantiate a range of discrete integral values like `0 until size` which is equivalent to `0..(size - 1)`.
22+
23+
Despite all of this, due to asymmetry between `..` and `until`, the former is used more often, even in cases where the latter would be more clear.
24+
Also, our UX research shows that Kotlin newcomers have troubles remembering whether the upper bound of the range produced by `until`
25+
is exclusive or inclusive.
26+
27+
To mitigate that, we propose to introduce the operator `..<` in Kotlin that would be
28+
on par with the `..` operator and make it very clear that the upper bound is not included.
29+
30+
## Use cases
31+
32+
Currently, the use cases of the new operator are mostly covered by the `until` function, that corrects the upper bound
33+
returning a closed range of integral values that would be equivalent to an open-ended range.
34+
However, the `until` function is available only for integral or discrete argument types, such as `Int`, `Long`, `Char`,
35+
and having the new operator gives a chance for introducing open-ended ranges for those type that didn't have it before.
36+
37+
### Iterating indices of a data structure
38+
39+
Typically, data structures start indexing at zero and thus most indexed loops on these data structures
40+
have the form of `for (index in 0 until size)`. Such a common use case deserves introducing a designated operator with
41+
a clear meaning.
42+
43+
### Discretization and bucketing of continuous values
44+
45+
Discretization and binning require splitting the domain of a continuous value to a number of non-overlapping intervals.
46+
Such intervals are usually chosen as ranges that include their lower bound and exclude the upper bound, so that two
47+
adjacent ranges neither have a point where they overlap, nor a point between them that is not contained in these ranges.
48+
49+
Even sometimes when the value is already discrete, for example, when it is expressed as a `Double` number,
50+
and it is possible to represent a half-open range with a closed one by adjusting one of its bounds,
51+
in practice it is not convenient to work with such ranges:
52+
53+
```kotlin
54+
val equivalent = 1.0..2.0.nextDown() // contains the same values as 1.0..<2.0 range
55+
println(eqivalent) // 1..1.9999999999999998
56+
```
57+
58+
## Similar API review
59+
60+
### Languages that distinguish end-inclusive and end-exclusive ranges
61+
62+
- Swift: `...` end-inclusive range, `..<` end-exclusive, supports one-sided ranges
63+
- Ruby: `..` end-inclusive range, `...` end-exclusive, supports one-sided ranges
64+
- Groovy: `..` end-inclusive range, `..<` end-exclusive, `<..` start-exclusive, `<..<` both bounds-exclusive range
65+
66+
67+
### Libraries for representing ranges
68+
69+
- Guava library provides the single `Range` class capable of representing full variety of mathematical range types:
70+
closed, open, unbounded. The range is defined by the properties `hasLower/UpperBound` which indicate whether the range is bounded or not,
71+
and then with `lower/upperEndPoint` and `lower/upperBoundType` properties which can be obtained only if the range has that bound.
72+
See https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/RangesExplained for details.
73+
74+
- Groovy supports [_number_ ranges](https://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/api/groovy/lang/NumberRange.html) (including `IntRange`)
75+
with bounds being individually excluded or included. This is indicated by `inclusiveLeft` and `inclusiveRight` properties.
76+
However, the base [Range](https://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/api/groovy/lang/Range.html) interface doesn't indicate inclusiveness and
77+
has somewhat contradictory contract of `containsWithinBounds` function.
78+
79+
- Swift distinguishes open-ended [`Range`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/range) and closed [`ClosedRange`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/closedrange)
80+
structures.
81+
82+
- [kotlin-statistics](https://github.com/thomasnield/kotlin-statistics/blob/master/src/main/kotlin/org/nield/kotlinstatistics/range)
83+
library provides the base `Range` type and individual types for each combination of included/excluded bounds:
84+
`OpenRange`, `OpenClosedRange`, `ClosedOpenRange`, `XClosedRange`.
85+
86+
- [kotlinx-interval](https://github.com/Whathecode/kotlinx.interval) library uses approach similar to Groovy, but in a more generic fashion:
87+
the base `Interval` type indicates whether bounds are inclusive or exclusive with the boolean properties
88+
`isStartIncluded`/`isEndIncluded`
89+
90+
91+
## Language changes
92+
93+
In order to use the new `..<` operator in code and be able to overload it for user types,
94+
we provide the following operator convention:
95+
96+
```kotlin
97+
operator fun FromType.rangeUntil(to: ToType): RangeType
98+
```
99+
100+
Similar to `rangeTo` operator, this operator convention can be satisfied either with a member
101+
or an extension function taking `FromType`, the type of the first operand, as the receiver, and `ToType`, the type of the second operand, as the parameter.
102+
Usually `FromType` and `ToType` refer to the same type.
103+
104+
## API Details
105+
106+
When introducing `rangeUntil` operator support in the standard library, we pursue the following goals:
107+
108+
- for consistency, `rangeUntil` operator should be provided for the same types that currently have `rangeTo` operator;
109+
- `rangeUntil` should return an instance of type representing open-ended ranges;
110+
- it should be an easy and compatible change to replace the existing `until` function with the `..<` operator.
111+
Therefore, the type returned by `rangeUntil` should be the same type or a subtype of the type that is currently
112+
returned by `until` for the given argument types.
113+
114+
The following new types and operations will be introduced in the `kotlin.ranges` packages in the common Kotlin standard library.
115+
116+
### OpenEndRange interface
117+
118+
The new interface to represent open-ended ranges is very similar to the existing `ClosedRange<T>` interface:
119+
120+
```kotlin
121+
interface OpenEndRange<T : Comparable<T>> {
122+
// lower bound
123+
val start: T
124+
// upper bound, not included in the range
125+
val endExclusive: T
126+
127+
operator fun contains(value: T): Boolean = value >= start && value < endExclusive
128+
129+
fun isEmpty(): Boolean = start >= endExclusive
130+
}
131+
```
132+
133+
The difference is that it has the property `endExclusive` for the upper bound instead of `endInclusive` and uses different comparison
134+
operators when comparing with the upper bound.
135+
136+
### Implementing OpenEndRange in the existing iterable ranges
137+
138+
Currently, in a situation when a user needs to get a range with excluded upper bound, they use `until` function producing
139+
a closed iterable range effectively with the same values. In order to make these ranges acceptable in the new API that takes
140+
`OpenEndRange<T>`, we want to implement that interface in the existing iterable ranges: `IntRange`, `LongRange`, `CharRange`,
141+
`UIntRange`, `ULongRange`. So they will be implementing both `ClosedRange<T>` and `OpenEndRange<T>` interfaces simultaneously.
142+
143+
```kotlin
144+
class IntRange : IntProgression(...), ClosedRange<Int>, OpenEndRange<Int> {
145+
override val start: Int
146+
override val endInclusive: Int
147+
override val endExclusive: Int
148+
}
149+
```
150+
151+
There's a subtlety in implementing `endExclusive` property in such ranges: usually it returns `endInclusive + 1`, but
152+
there can be such ranges where `endInclusive` is already the maximum value of the range type, and so adding one to it
153+
would overflow.
154+
155+
We decided that in such cases the reasonable behavior would be to throw an exception from the `endExclusive` property
156+
getter. The possibility of that will be documented in the base interface, `OpenEndRange`, and additionally the implementation
157+
of that property will be deprecated in the existing concrete range classes.
158+
159+
### rangeUntil operators for the standard types
160+
161+
`rangeUntil` operators will be provided for the same types and their combinations that currently have `rangeTo` operator defined.
162+
For the purposes of prototype, we provide them as extension functions, but for consistency we plan to make them members
163+
later, before stabilizing the open-ended ranges API.
164+
165+
### Generic open-ended ranges of comparable values
166+
167+
Similar to closed ranges, there will be a function instantiating an open-ended range from any two values of a comparable type:
168+
169+
```kotlin
170+
operator fun <T : Comparable<T>> T.rangeUntil(that: T): OpenEndRange<T>
171+
```
172+
173+
### Specialized open-ended ranges of floating point numbers
174+
175+
There also will be two static specializations of `rangeUntil` operator for `Double` and `Float` types of arguments.
176+
They are special in how they compare values of their bounds with the value passed to `contains` and between themselves,
177+
so that a range where either bound is NaN is empty, and the `NaN` value is not contained in any range.
178+
179+
```kotlin
180+
operator fun Double.rangeUntil(that: Double): OpenEndRange<Double>
181+
operator fun Float.rangeUntil(that: Float): OpenEndRange<Float>
182+
```
183+
184+
## Experimental status
185+
186+
Both the language feature of `rangeUntil` operator and its supporting standard library API
187+
are to be released in Kotlin 1.7.20 in [Experimental](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/components-stability.html#stability-levels-explained) status.
188+
189+
In order to use `..<` operator or to implement that operator convention for own types,
190+
the corresponding language feature should be enabled with the `-XXLanguage:+RangeUntilOperator` compiler argument.
191+
192+
The new API elements introduced to support the open-ended ranges of the standard types
193+
require an opt-in as usual experimental stdlib API:
194+
`@OptIn(ExperimentalStdlibApi::class)`. Alternatively, a compiler argument `-opt-in=kotlin.ExperimentalStdlibApi`
195+
can be specified.
196+
197+
We recommend library developers to [propagate](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/opt-in-requirements.html#propagating-opt-in) the opt-in requirement,
198+
if they use experimental API in their code.
199+
200+
## Alternatives
201+
202+
### Adapt the existing range interface for open-ended ranges
203+
204+
Instead of introducing a new interface for open-ended ranges, reuse the existing range interface and
205+
add a boolean parameter indicating whether the bound is included or excluded.
206+
207+
- pro: such approach is similar to one used in Groovy and Guava and allows to support ranges with an open lower bound later
208+
without introducing a new type
209+
- con: the existing users of `ClosedRange` type would be very unprepared and surprised if the range begins to exclude its bound
210+
indicating that with a new boolean property.
211+
- con: it would be impossible to represent both closed and equivalent open-ended integral range with the same instance,
212+
so changing `until` to `..<` would be a more painful change.
213+
214+
215+
## Open questions and considerations
216+
217+
### Search friendliness
218+
219+
Usually internet search engines disregard punctuation characters, so it might be
220+
hard to find what `..<` means in Kotlin. For example, currently the search https://www.google.com/search?q=swift+operator+..%3C
221+
doesn't show any relevant results about that Swift range operator.
222+
223+
### Common supertype of ClosedRange and OpenEndRange
224+
225+
If the range of a value is closed, for example `0.0..1.0`, then splitting it into a number of ranges
226+
will require a combination of open-ended ranges and one closed range in the end, e.g.:
227+
`0.0..<0.1`, `0.1..<0.2`, ..., `0.9..1.0`.
228+
Putting these ranges into a list would make its element type inferred to `Any`, and that would make working with elements inconvenient.
229+
230+
Introducing a more dedicated common supertype of the `ClosedRange` and `OpenEndRange` could help in this situation,
231+
however, it's unclear what useful operations such supertype would provide.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)