|
1 | 1 | # Cylinder on inclined plane 2D - comparison between analytical and numerical solution with MPM |
| 2 | + |
2 | 3 | **Author:** Philip Franz |
3 | 4 |
|
4 | | -**Kratos version:** Development branch. **Expected 9.1** |
| 5 | +**Kratos version:** **9.5** |
5 | 6 |
|
6 | 7 | **Source files:** [cylinder_on_inclined_plane_2D](https://github.com/KratosMultiphysics/Examples/tree/master/mpm/validation/cylinder_on_inclined_plane/source) |
7 | 8 |
|
8 | | - |
9 | | - |
10 | 9 | ## Case Specification |
11 | 10 |
|
12 | 11 | This is a 2D simulation of a cylinder on an inclined plane. A rotating as well as a frictionless sliding behaviour of the cylinder are regarded subsequently. The simulation is set up according to section 4.5.2 of (Iaconeta, 2019). |
@@ -42,16 +41,11 @@ The analytical and numerical solution for the displacement function of the respe |
42 | 41 | The left image displays the rolling cylinder - modelled with option "contact". The right one shows the sliding cylinder (frictionless) - modelled with option "slip". |
43 | 42 |
|
44 | 43 | <p align="center"> |
45 | | - <img alt="Light" src="data/rolling cylinder gif.gif" width="45%"> |
| 44 | + <img alt="Light" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KratosMultiphysics/Examples/refs/heads/master/mpm/validation/cylinder_on_inclined_plane/data/rolling%20cylinder%20gif.gif" width="45%"> |
46 | 45 | |
47 | | - <img alt="Dark" src="data/sliding cylinder gif.gif" width="46%"> |
| 46 | + <img alt="Dark" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KratosMultiphysics/Examples/refs/heads/master/mpm/validation/cylinder_on_inclined_plane/data/sliding%20cylinder%20gif.gif" width="46%"> |
48 | 47 | </p> |
49 | 48 |
|
50 | | - |
51 | | - |
52 | | - |
53 | | - |
54 | | - |
55 | 49 | ## References |
56 | | -- Iaconeta, I. (2019). *Discrete-continuum hybrid modelling of flowing and static regimes.* (Ph.D. thesis). Universitat politècnica de Catalunya - Barcelona tech |
57 | | -- Chandra, B., Singer, V., Teschemacher, T., Wüchner, R., Larese, A. (2021) *Nonconforming Dirichlet boundary conditions in implicit material point method by means of penalty augmentation*. Acta Geotech. 16, 2315–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01123-3 |
| 50 | +- Iaconeta, I. (2019). **Discrete-continuum hybrid modelling of flowing and static regimes**, *Ph.D. thesis*, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona |
| 51 | +- Chandra, B., Singer, V., Teschemacher, T., Wuechner, R., & Larese, A. (2021). **Nonconforming Dirichlet boundary conditions in implicit material point method by means of penalty augmentation**, *Acta Geotechnica*, 16(8), 2315-2335. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01123-3">10.1007/s11440-020-01123-3</a>. |
0 commit comments