Skip to content

Conversation

@ArzhelaR
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArzhelaR ArzhelaR commented Jul 1, 2025

Significant changes have been made to the 'mesh analysis' process.

  • Previously, actions were defined as either valid or invalid based on specific topological and geometric criteria, such as nodes adjacency, face orientation with cross products, edge length, angle , and so on. This type of analysis is now always possible in the 'TriMeshOldAnalysis' and 'QuadMeshOldAnalysis' classes.

  • Now, a new analysis class has been added: 'TriMeshQualityAnalysis'. This defines the validity of actions according to topological criteria and a classification of possible geometric configurations, as detailed in the documentation. Combined with observation of this classification, learning becomes more consistent.

  • Later on, new classes can be added to test new analysis methods.

ArzhelaR and others added 16 commits May 28, 2025 09:35
…tion validation.

There are still some issues that need to be corrected.
A new feature has been added to mesh plotting: dart ID visualization.

Only the flip action is available.

New topological checks are performed after actions.
A geometrical quality criterion is now included in the observation.

This is so far only supported in a trimesh_full environment with action flip.
…s and with old geometrical analysis. There are still some kinds of meshes which create problems with the new analysis
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-0.65% (target: -1.00%) 87.29%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6982248) 1634 1430 87.52%
Head commit (7cce9d1) 2162 (+528) 1878 (+448) 86.86% (-0.65%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#66) 1251 1092 87.29%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@ArzhelaR ArzhelaR merged commit b2e6a11 into main Jul 2, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@ArzhelaR ArzhelaR deleted the 65-only-topological-constraints branch July 2, 2025 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants