loop api naming
#8027
Replies: 2 comments
-
that is true, so maybe the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
IMO, I prefer the current approach for the
For skip, I think Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@Borda suggested the following for the API naming in new loops:
Loop.is_done
instead ofLoop.done
Loop.should_skip
instead ofLoop.skip
Note, these are properties, not methods.
Do you prefer the longer name (less ambiguous) or shorter name (easier to remember)
@justusschock @ananthsub @tchaton @Borda
Vote:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions