|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Contributor Communication |
| 3 | +description: Communication strategy and framework for the Model Context Protocol community |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +This document provides practical guidance for communicating and collaborating within the Model Context Protocol (MCP) project. It outlines the communication channels, workflows, and processes used by the MCP community. |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +All communication within the MCP community is governed by our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md). We expect all participants to maintain respectful, professional, and inclusive interactions across all channels. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Communication Channels |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +We support three primary communication channels: the public Discord server, [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues), and [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/discussions) in the [main project repository](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol). |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +### Discord |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +For real-time contributor discussion and collaboration. The server is designed around **MCP contributors** and is not intended |
| 17 | +to be a place for general MCP support. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +The Discord server will have both public and private channels. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +#### Public Channels (Default) |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +- **Purpose**: Open community engagement, collaborative development, and transparent project coordination. |
| 24 | +- Primary use cases: |
| 25 | + - **Public SDK and tooling development**: All development, from ideation to release planning, happens in public channels (e.g., `#typescript-sdk-dev`, `#inspector-dev`). |
| 26 | + - **Working and interest group discussions** (`#client-implementors`, `#agents-wg`, etc.) |
| 27 | + - **Working Group**: Some specific goal or project in mind (such as an SDK, inspector, registry, server-identity, load-balancing, etc). |
| 28 | + - **Interest Group**: An abstract gathering of folks that might raise a range of various topics. Some might get actioned on as one-offs, others might spin into Working Groups. |
| 29 | + - **Community onboarding** and contribution guidance. |
| 30 | + - **Community feedback** and collaborative brainstorming. |
| 31 | + - Public **office hours** and **maintainer availability**. |
| 32 | +- Avoid: |
| 33 | + - MCP user support: participants are expected to read official documentation and start new GitHub Discussions for questions or support. |
| 34 | + - Service or product marketing: interactions on this Discord are expected to be vendor-neutral and not used for brand-building or sales. Mentions of brands or products are discouraged outside of being used as examples or responses to conversations that start off focused on the specification. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +#### Private channels (Exceptions) |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- **Purpose**: Confidential coordination and sensitive matters that cannot be discussed publicly. Access will be restricted to designated maintainers. |
| 39 | +- **Strict criteria for private use**: |
| 40 | + - **Security incidents** (CVEs, protocol vulnerabilities). |
| 41 | + - **People matters** (maintainer-related discussions, code of conduct policies). |
| 42 | + - Select channels will be configured to be **read-only**. This can be good for example for maintainer decision making. |
| 43 | + - Coordination requiring **immediate** or otherwise **focused response** with a limited audience. |
| 44 | +- **Transparency**: |
| 45 | + - **All technical and governance decisions** affecting the community **must be documented** in GitHub Discussions and/or Issues, and will be labeled with `notes`. |
| 46 | + - **Some matters related to individual contributors** may remain private when appropriate (e.g., personal circumstances, disciplinary actions, or other sensitive individual matters). |
| 47 | + - Private channels are to be used as **temporary "incident rooms,"** not for routine development. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Any significant discussion on Discord that leads to a potential decision or proposal must be moved to a GitHub Discussion or GitHub Issue to create a persistent, searchable record. Proposals will then be promoted to full-fledged PRs with associated work items (GitHub Issues) as needed. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +### GitHub Discussions |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +For structured, long-form discussion and debate on project direction, features, improvements, and community topics. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +When to use: |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +- Project roadmap planning and milestone discussions |
| 58 | +- Announcements and release communications |
| 59 | +- Community polls and consensus-building processes |
| 60 | +- Feature requests with context and rationale |
| 61 | + - If a particular repository does not have GitHub Discussions enabled, feel free to open a GitHub Issue instead. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +### GitHub Issues |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +For bug reports, feature tracking, and actionable development tasks. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +When to use: |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +- Submit SEP proposals (following the [SEP guidelines](./sep-guidelines)) |
| 70 | +- Bug reports with reproducible steps |
| 71 | +- Documentation improvements with specific scope |
| 72 | +- CI/CD problems and infrastructure issues |
| 73 | +- Release tasks and milestone tracking |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +### Security Issues |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +**Do not post security issues publicly.** Instead: |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +1. Use the private security reporting process. For protocol-level security issues, follow the process in [SECURITY.md in the modelcontextprotocol GitHub repository](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/blob/main/SECURITY.md). |
| 80 | +2. Contact lead and/or [core maintainers](./governance#current-core-maintainers) directly. |
| 81 | +3. Follow responsible disclosure guidelines. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +## Decision Records |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +All MCP decisions are documented and captured in public channels. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +- **Technical decisions**: [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues) and SEPs. |
| 88 | +- **Specification changes**: [On the Model Context Protocol website](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog). |
| 89 | +- **Process changes**: [Community documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/community/governance). |
| 90 | +- **Governance decisions and updates**: [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues) and SEPs. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +When documenting decisions, we will retain as much context as possible: |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +- Decision makers |
| 95 | +- Background context and motivation |
| 96 | +- Options that were considered |
| 97 | +- Rationale for the chosen approach |
| 98 | +- Implementation steps |
0 commit comments