Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hello @su-12345, Perhaps you can try adding a drain type boundary condition (DRN package) to the cell(s) representing ag fields. Within the DRN package, you must specify the elevation and conductance of each DRN boundary. For stress periods corresponding to when the tide is above the pre-determined threshold, you could set the conductance equal to zero which will effectively shut-off the DRN boundary. Once tidal levels drop below your pre-determined threshold, you could specify a non-zero conductance for the DRN boundaries for that stress period. In the MF6 I/O guide, the input looks like: Assuming DRN package applies to only a couple different cells and the tide level rises above your shut-off threshold in stress period 2, you could do something like, Regarding the ditch that receives the DRN water, you can use MVR to facilitate the transfer of water from the DRN boundary to the ditch, assuming you represent the ditch with the streamflow routing (SFR) package. However, SFR does not currently offer functionality representing hydraulic structures, such as a gate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
I’m building a simple conceptual model in ModelMuse using MODFLOW 6. The setup is:
- If tide is below the drain level → drainage can occur
- If tide is above the drain level → drainage is blocked
Ultimately, I want to explore how changes in this drainage window (due to tides) affect groundwater heads in the field.
I’m stuck on how to best implement this "floodgate-style" behaviour in ModelMuse.
Has anyone successfully set up tide-controlled drainage logic in ModelMuse or know a good workaround?
Would love any advice on:
Happy to hear any suggestions or ideas, going in circles with my attempts currently!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions