-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
Open
Description
I see that your fork is very interested in improved f0/pitch tracking.
See my comment on the original repo, RVC-Project#2373, where I write:
Consider using the pitch trackers from penn which might be higher quality.
NOTES:
- Use the dev branch of that repo, according to their README.
- The paper shows that
FCNF0++andDeepF0++are almost equally good, without must statistical difference detected in their experiments.
[edit: I seem to recall that DeepF0++ uses less memory than FCNF0++, but it's worth checking this again]
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels