Skip to content

Better pitch / f0 tracking #234

@turian

Description

@turian

I see that your fork is very interested in improved f0/pitch tracking.

See my comment on the original repo, RVC-Project#2373, where I write:

Consider using the pitch trackers from penn which might be higher quality.

NOTES:

  • Use the dev branch of that repo, according to their README.
  • The paper shows that FCNF0++ and DeepF0++ are almost equally good, without must statistical difference detected in their experiments.

[edit: I seem to recall that DeepF0++ uses less memory than FCNF0++, but it's worth checking this again]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions