Skip to content

Commit 28d9625

Browse files
committed
update links
1 parent cd6232c commit 28d9625

File tree

16 files changed

+23
-23
lines changed

16 files changed

+23
-23
lines changed

en/development/announce/6-2.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ with binaries for the new release shortly.
457457
Thanks
458458
------
459459

460-
The MapServer team would like to thank `Météo-France <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Météo-France>`_
460+
The MapServer team would like to thank `Météo-France <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Météo-France>`_
461461
for funding a number of the new features present in this release.
462462

463463
Finally, thank you to all of the users, developers, and supporters of MapServer. Enjoy!

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-108.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ each sample of the sparse dataset. They are usually represented with a
2222
color-ramp where the hue encodes the density of the data sample, optionally
2323
along with the intensity of an attribute. The "heatmap" term itself is used
2424
with varying meanings; in the context of this RFC, we will be using it to
25-
reference `Kernel Density Estimation <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_kernel_density_estimation>`_
25+
reference `Kernel Density Estimation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_kernel_density_estimation>`_
2626
maps.
2727

2828
.. figure:: ../../images/heatmap-wikipedia.png

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-113.txt

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
44
MS RFC 113: Layer Compositing Pipeline
55
======================================
66

7-
:Date: 2015/02
7+
:Date: 2015-02
88
:Author: Thomas Bonfort
99
1010
:Status: Implemented
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ MS RFC 113: Layer Compositing Pipeline
1515

1616
Some cartographic renderings would benefit from the addition of advanced
1717
blending modes, as can be explained in detail in
18-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blend_modes . In particular, this functionality is
18+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blend_modes . In particular, this functionality is
1919
essential for more pleasant renderings of raster hillshadings over vector
2020
surfaces.
2121

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-24-FIRSTDRAFT.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Memory management in SWIG wrappers has a tradition of being difficult and error
2424
Most modern languages implement garbage collection, so that the developer does not have to care about memory management.
2525
The programming language tracks memory (or objects, really) allocations and when an object goes out of scope (it is no more reachable from the running program) it marks it as eligible for garbage collection. A background process once in a while wakes up and frees the memory associated with marked objects.
2626
For the details on GC see this wikipedia entry:
27-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_collection_(computer_science)
27+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_collection_(computer_science)
2828

2929
What happens in most cases is that some memory is allocated in, say, Java, then another pointer is
3030
pointed to it by invoking some wrapped method.

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-24.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ keyed by memory address. This will eliminate the need for a change to *every*
208208
object but might present a greater impact on performance. In particular the
209209
hash function must be chosen carefully.
210210

211-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table
211+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table
212212

213213
The example implementation proposed at the tracker `bug #2032`_ adopts the
214214
first strategy.

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-76.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ The ability to use the XMP facility across output drivers would be desirable, bu
150150
+1 Mike Smith
151151

152152

153-
.. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform
153+
.. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform
154154
.. [2] http://www.adobe.com/products/xmp/overview.html
155155
.. [3] http://wiki.creativecommons.org/XMP
156156
.. [4] http://libopenraw.freedesktop.org/wiki/Exempi

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-78.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ values at a given location we can compute a rotation and magnitude and use
2323
that to draw an arrow of a size proportional to the magnitude and pointing
2424
in the direction of the phenomenon (wind, current, etc.)
2525

26-
For more details about vector fields, refer to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_field
26+
For more details about vector fields, refer to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_field
2727

2828
Visual example (rendered with MapServer):
2929

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-85.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ MS RFC 85: Vector Contour Rendering (CONNECTIONTYPE CONTOUR)
1616
This is a proposal to add the ability to compute and render contour layers on
1717
the fly in MapServer from a raster source. The source is one band of raster
1818
data, which represents a digital elevation model (DEM). More info about DEMs at:
19-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_elevation_model
19+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_elevation_model
2020

2121
Contours can already be rendered today using a standard vector layer but this
2222
requires an extra processing step with gdal_contour to pre-generate the contours

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-90.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ by spaces or newlines)
5353
END
5454

5555

56-
We can also specify IP ranges using the `CIDR notation <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIDR_notation>`_ , like: "192.168.1.0/24"
56+
We can also specify IP ranges using the `CIDR notation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing#CIDR_notation>`_ , like: "192.168.1.0/24"
5757

5858
Setting ows_allowed_ip_list will deny all other IPs not specified in the list, and setting ows_denied_ip_list will allow all other IPs not specified in the list. When we both allow and deny a given IP the denial will take precedence.
5959

en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-98.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ languages, it has a number of shortcomings that this RFC aims to resolve:
6363
- While latin languages have a 1-to-1 mapping between string characters and font glyphs,
6464
this is not the case for complex languages, where ligature glyphs need to be inserted
6565
depending on context (see the `wikipedia complex text layout page
66-
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_text_layout>`_ for a more complete explanation).
66+
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_text_layout>`_ for a more complete explanation).
6767
While this is partly taken care of for us by fribidi for arabic (which has a shaping
6868
algorithm that inserts ligatures for us), we currently fail hard for other complex
6969
text languages.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)