Bugzilla Brilliance

[MasterInQuestion]

    Instead of addressing the actual problems: addressing the problems' reporter instead, shall somewhat miraculously work..?

    Would the problem, miraculously disappear: only because it was not referenced anymore?
    Would not reckoning the gravity thereby have things to fall no more?

    Facts are facts, irrelevant of being recognized or not.
    Feigned blindness won't do help.

[MasterInQuestion]

    On the tech level of current Mozilla...
[[

|*| https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/131.0beta/releasenotes/#note-790366
|*| https://www.mozilla.org/media/img/firefox/releasenotes/note-images/ETP%20Mobile%20131.jpg

> exiftool -U -ee3 -g3:5:2 -api "RequestAll=0" -api "ByteUnit=Binary" "ETP Mobile 131.jpg"
---- ExifTool ----
ExifTool Version Number         : 12.97
---- System:Other ----
File Name                       : ETP Mobile 131.jpg
Directory                       : .
File Size                       : 299 KiB
File Permissions                : -rw-rw-rw-
---- System:Time ----
File Modification Date/Time     : 2024:09:12 17:42:43+00:00
File Access Date/Time           : 2024:09:12 17:42:43+00:00
File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2024:09:12 17:42:43+00:00
---- JPEG:Other ----
File Type                       : JPEG
File Type Extension             : jpg
MIME Type                       : image/jpeg
---- JPEG-APP1:Image ----
Exif Byte Order                 : Big-endian (Motorola, MM)
---- JPEG-APP1-IFD0:Image ----
Image Width                     : 1440
Image Height                    : 3088
Software                        : Android UP1A.231005.007.S918WVLS4CXE9
Orientation                     : Horizontal (normal)
---- JPEG-APP1-IFD0-ExifIFD:Time ----
Date/Time Original              : 2024:09:12 09:23:05
Sub Sec Time Original           : 601
Offset Time                     : -04:00
Offset Time Original            : -04:00
---- JPEG-APP1-IFD0-ExifIFD:Image ----
Image Unique ID                 : 646286e0-3276-4cb2-99a1-71cf03fbbffc
---- JPEG-APP1-IFD0-ExifIFD:Camera ----
Light Source                    : Unknown
---- JPEG-APP1-IFD0:Time ----
Modify Date                     : 2024:09:12 09:23:05
---- JPEG-APP0-JFIF:Image ----
JFIF Version                    : 1.01
Resolution Unit                 : cm
X Resolution                    : 59
Y Resolution                    : 59
---- JPEG-SOF0:Image ----
Image Width                     : 1440
Image Height                    : 2974
Encoding Process                : Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample                 : 8
Color Components                : 3
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling            : YCbCr4:2:0 (2 2)
---- JPEG-Trailer-Samsung:Other ----
Samsung Trailer 0x0da1 Name     : Captured_App_Info
Samsung Trailer 0x0da1          : (Binary data 84 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Samsung Trailer 0x0c51 Name     : Samsung_Capture_Info
Samsung Capture Info            : Screenshot
Samsung Trailer 0x0ba1 Name     : PhotoEditor_Re_Edit_Data
Samsung Trailer 0x0ba1          : (Binary data 1195 bytes, use -b option to extract)
Samsung Trailer 0x0ba1 Name     : Original_Path_Hash_Key
Samsung Trailer 0x0ba1          : (Binary data 71 bytes, use -b option to extract)
---- Composite:Image ----
Image Size                      : 1440x2974
Megapixels                      : 4.3
---- Composite:Time ----
Date/Time Original              : 2024:09:12 09:23:05.601-04:00
Modify Date                     : 2024:09:12 09:23:05-04:00

]]
    exiftool -b -U "-SamsungTrailer_0x0da1" "ETP Mobile 131.jpg" | base64 -d
[[
{"comp":"org.mozilla.firefox\/org.mozilla.fenix.HomeActivity"}
]]
    exiftool -b -U "-SamsungTrailer_0x0ba1" "ETP Mobile 131.jpg"
[[

{
  "originalPath": "/data/sec/photoeditor/0/6a68cc2e002995a650fb3a8f5a3947356765be6eb22bee61afd50a963f55508a_414741.jpg",
  "representativeFrameLoc": -1,
  "startMotionVideo": -1,
  "endMotionVideo": -1,
  "isMotionVideoMute": false,
  "isTrimMotionVideo": false,
  "clipInfoValue": {
    "mCenterX": 0.5,
    "mCenterY": 0.5184744596481323,
    "mWidth": 1,
    "mHeight": 0.9630511403083801,
    "mRotation": 0,
    "mRotate": 0,
    "mHFlip": 0,
    "mVFlip": 0,
    "mRotationEffect": 0,
    "mRotateEffect": 0,
    "mHFlipEffect": 0,
    "mVFlipEffect": 0,
    "mHozPerspective": 0,
    "mVerPerspective": 0
  },
  "toneValue": {
    "brightness": 100,
    "exposure": 100,
    "contrast": 100,
    "saturation": 100,
    "hue": 100,
    "wbMode": -1,
    "wbTemperature": 100,
    "tint": 100,
    "shadow": 100,
    "highlight": 100,
    "lightbalance": 100,
    "sharpness": 100,
    "definition": 100,
    "isBrightnessIPE": true,
    "isExposureIPE": true,
    "isContrastIPE": true,
    "isSaturationIPE": true
  },
  "effectValue": "{ \"filterIndication\": 4097, \"filterType\": 0, \"alphaValue\": 100 }",
  "isBlending": true,
  "isNotReEdit": false,
  "sepVersion": "150100",
  "ndeVersion": 1,
  "reSize": 4,
  "isScaleAI": false,
  "rotation": 1,
  "adjustmentValue": "{ \"mCropState\": 131076 }",
  "isApplyShapeCorrection": false,
  "isNewReEditOnly": false,
  "isDecoReEditOnly": false
}

]]
(refactored)
    ~~exiftool -b -U -a "-SamsungTrailer_0x0ba1" "ETP Mobile 131.jpg"~~
    [ ^ https://github.com/exiftool/exiftool/issues/280#issuecomment-2395063409 ]
    exiftool -b -U "-Copy1:SamsungTrailer_0x0ba1" "ETP Mobile 131.jpg"
[[
7a00b3251712428c8cd618663073bfdd61bf00176160fc6248788c265cee150c/414741
]]
(SHA-256 of "originalPath"; 414,741 B? (original size?) )

    Attachment to demonstrate anti-fingerprinting... while itself an example of failed counter-fingerprinting?
    How sarcastic...
    Apparently they're testing the browser on some leaky OS.
    And I highly doubt whether they really use the browser at all... (on such)

    See also: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1837693#c32


    Let not to mention the alike bad compression:
    https://dev.to/ben/the-devto-search-engine-is-actually-pretty-damn-useful-1ic/comments#comment-2hgbe
    Neither of quality nor size...

    For reference:
    https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/raw/main/MasterInQuestion/talk/37/ETP_Mobile_131.webp
    (~ 289.58 KiB; WebP Lossless: 1440x2974)
[ ^
    Mere re-encoding (plus implicit colorspace conversion) without further processing.
    Size reduction of 60%+ excepted with proper denoise: and shall be of higher quality than JPEG original... ]

    ----

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/independent-voices/
    "Privacy has been part of Mozilla's vision from day one"

    Woe that Google appears more sensitive about privacy affairs...
    (~ 162.9 KiB; JPEG: YUV 4:2:0, 1600x1055)
[[
> curl "https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/JjIUS85ALsiHLpc6hb9OEDid5_DFwlCemIWKdRhSJFMRIsnQLq2uxcyEfK5GVHT5q4yKBYuBga337iwmmAVftPTmZntvI3GJvlcJ0xKSEw-5QvqQATZh77dGDM8vmkkKgx3mGZPSJi97bB_uB60m1ujPFiIAQtid9gw0CctQZQ4MEAwcbRduZtlp" | exiftool -U -ee3 -g3:5:2 -api "RequestAll=0" -api "ByteUnit=Binary" -
---- ExifTool ----
ExifTool Version Number         : 12.97
---- System:Time ----
File Modification Date/Time     : 2022:10:18 13:08:19+00:00
File Access Date/Time           : 2022:10:18 13:08:19+00:00
File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2022:10:18 13:08:19+00:00
---- System:Other ----
File Permissions                : prw-------
---- JPEG:Other ----
File Type                       : JPEG
File Type Extension             : jpg
MIME Type                       : image/jpeg
---- JPEG-APP0-JFIF:Image ----
JFIF Version                    : 1.01
Resolution Unit                 : None
X Resolution                    : 1
Y Resolution                    : 1
---- JPEG-SOF0:Image ----
Image Width                     : 1600
Image Height                    : 1055
Encoding Process                : Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample                 : 8
Color Components                : 3
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling            : YCbCr4:2:0 (2 2)
---- Composite:Image ----
Image Size                      : 1600x1055
Megapixels                      : 1.7
]]
    Quite the Innovator.

[MasterInQuestion]

    Google's JPEG appears outright come from ImageMagick, with the "-strip" option:
    E.g. magick -quality 50 -sampling-factor "4:2:0" "${In}[0]" -strip "${Out}.jpg"

    The dummy JFIF appears quite symbolic.

[MasterInQuestion]

[[
= Re: Bug 1909751 - Adjust margins for Toolbar =

[ honorificabilitudinitatibus@tutanota.com @ CE 2024-11-01 10:03:20 UTC:
    Regression:
    Excessive left-right padding without enabling Navigation Toolbar
    ("Secret Settings": "Enable Navigation Toolbar") ]
]]


    .
    For ~ 3 months and couldn't get a simple toolbar alright...
    (previous broken inadvertently)

    Now finally fixed:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1961852
    ; after over ~ 7 months...

    ----

[[
= Autofill invoked on password field didn't set accordingly username =

[ Master ? @ CE 2024-08-28 14:40:27 UTC:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915414#c0
    As that invoking on username field did. (setting both)
    Inconsistent behavior preferably fixed.

    E.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/login ]

----

[ miralobontiu @ CE 2024-10-07 13:47:20 UTC:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915414#c1
    Closing as INCOMPLETE, since the reporter is inactive, and QA cannot reproduce the issue.
    Tested on the Fenix Nightly 133.0a1 build, and on Firefox for Android 131.0:
    With Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Android 14), and Google Pixel 6 (Android 15). ]

----

[ honorificabilitudinitatibus@tutanota.com @ CE 2024-10-08 06:05:58 UTC:
    Is both:
    Autofill invoked on password field didn't set accordingly username
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915414
    .
    "Use strong password" abnormal display, and unpleasant workflow
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915417

    Unreproducible in your testing?

    See also:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890150#c3
    ; for my environment.
    Also this is no more reproducible for me in v132.


    Pardon for email bothering.
    Know not who has disabled my account for rather peculiar cause...
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915567
    .
    "Multiple failures to follow our etiquette guidelines."?
    Bugzilla Brilliance indeed. ]

---- (1)

[ Mira Lobontiu @ CE 2025-03-28 13:38:28 UTC:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890150#c10
    Closing as INCOMPLETE, since the reporter has an inactive account, and cannot provide further information. ]
]]
    Along with the same problems.
    Now (20250603) broken in different manner:
    https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/raw/main/MasterInQuestion/talk/37/spoiled-password+.webp
    .
    变本加厉...
+    Flip-origin aggravated...

    Probable regressor:
    https://hg-edge.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?startdate=2025-04-08+22:00:31&enddate=2025-04-08+22:00:33
    .
    Android toolbar compose rewrite
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948591

    Who coined such bloated broken unwieldy layout..?

    .
    A Home button scarcely of actual use.
    And Reader mode that always results in broken layout.
    Translation almost never gives accurate enough translation.
    And Share that hardly ever frequently used, constantly clogging.
    Plus the much meaningless mask icon, mostly mere interferes the number's reading.

    Had the actual URI part, that actually the most significant:
    Contracted to such invisible extent...

    See also: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930236
    [ https://bug1921184.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9430755 ]
    ^ Quite horrible Redesign.

    Main regressor: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1966670

[MasterInQuestion]

@miralobontiu

[MasterInQuestion]

= Enough of the Bugzilla Brilliance escapade..? =

    "Multiple failures to follow our etiquette guidelines."
    ?
    I don't have much to explain.
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1915567
    ; use reason.

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1887304
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784182#c6