Skip to content

readme.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
155 lines (87 loc) · 5.98 KB

readme.md

File metadata and controls

155 lines (87 loc) · 5.98 KB

Practical Use Cases of the Synchronized Fan-In Pattern in Go

The synchronized fan-in pattern combines multiple input channels into one output channel, just like the classic fan-in pattern. However, unlike the basic fan-in, each sender waits for an acknowledgment (wait chan) before sending the next message, ensuring a level of control, synchronization, and safety in message processing.

This distinction enables a wide range of real-world applications where rate limiting, state consistency, or acknowledgment is crucial.

Use Cases of Synchronized Fan-In

1. Transactional Data Ingestion

In financial systems (e.g., banks, trading), you ingest transaction records in parallel.

  • Why this pattern? Ensures each transaction is confirmed before the next is accepted, preserving auditability and consistency.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in may allow duplicate or unordered inputs. This pattern guarantees safe sequential processing.

2. Audio/Video Stream Synchronization

Multiple concurrent streams (video/audio/subtitles) must be aligned and synchronized before rendering.

  • Why this pattern? Each segment waits until acknowledged to maintain stream sync.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in has no guarantee that frames are consumed before the next arrives. Synchronized fan-in ensures decoding and timing control.

3. Machine Learning Inference Coordination

Parallel workers generate predictions; results are aggregated centrally.

  • Why this pattern? Workers wait until the central aggregator finishes using a result, avoiding overload.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in might flood the aggregator. This version enforces result-level throttling.

4. Multiplayer Game Event Processing

Player inputs (e.g., moves, attacks) arrive continuously.

  • Why this pattern? Server acknowledges valid events before accepting new ones, preventing exploits or out-of-order processing.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in accepts all inputs. This approach enforces input pacing and fairness.

5. Chat Server Message Coordination

Messages from multiple users are routed to a server and then broadcast.

  • Why this pattern? The server confirms delivery before new messages are processed, avoiding race conditions.
  • Difference: In regular fan-in, messages could be dropped or misordered. Synchronized fan-in maintains delivery integrity.

6. Replication Systems (e.g., DB Replication)

Replicated systems must apply writes in strict order.

  • Why this pattern? Source waits for replica acknowledgment before sending more.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in cannot enforce replication order. This enforces strict consistency.

7. Edge Device Coordination

Sensors (temperature, voltage, etc.) send values to a controller.

  • Why this pattern? Controller acknowledges each reading before more are allowed, managing processing load and timing.
  • Difference: Basic fan-in can overwhelm the controller. This keeps device-controller communication controlled and predictable.

8. Email/SMS Notification Queues

Multiple sources trigger notifications; central sender processes them.

  • Why this pattern? Sender confirms message was sent (or throttled) before next input.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in may exceed rate limits. This supports throttling and guaranteed delivery.

9. Sensor Data Aggregation

Hundreds of sensors push real-time data into a central analytics engine.

  • Why this pattern? The engine only lets new data in when it's ready, ensuring completeness.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in accepts firehose data. This version offers backpressure.

10. Real-Time Logging System

Concurrent services log messages to a collector.

  • Why this pattern? Logger controls log write rate, ensuring file or DB isn’t overwhelmed.
  • Difference: In regular fan-in, high-velocity logs can get dropped. This ensures controlled logging.

11. Pipeline Step Acknowledgment

Each stage of a processing pipeline receives items and must complete its step before new work arrives.

  • Why this pattern? Prevents queue buildup and enforces processing discipline.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in streams data unbounded. This provides per-step flow control.

12. Controlled API Gateway

Services feed requests into a shared outbound HTTP client.

  • Why this pattern? Outbound requests are rate-limited and synchronized.
  • Difference: Basic fan-in could cause burst traffic. This offers controlled, sequential flow.

13. Live Comment Streams

Users submit live comments that are moderated before being published.

  • Why this pattern? Each comment must be reviewed before the next is accepted.
  • Difference: Regular fan-in ignores moderation timing. This enforces sequential moderation.

14. Security Audit Event Queue

Events from many sources are collected and need to be verified for audit trail.

  • Why this pattern? Auditor confirms integrity and logs before allowing the next.
  • Difference: Fan-in alone can't enforce audit guarantees. This ensures each event is securely recorded.

15. Job Scheduler / Task Dispatcher

Workers pull tasks from a dispatcher; dispatcher must verify each job is running before giving another.

  • Why this pattern? Prevents task duplication or overload.
  • Difference: Fan-in can't manage pull timing. This ensures the dispatcher remains in control.

🔑 Summary: When to Use Synchronized Fan-In

Use this pattern when you need:

  • Flow control / backpressure
  • Acknowledgment before continuing
  • Guaranteed order or fairness
  • Controlled throughput under concurrency

This pattern is particularly suited to real-time systems, distributed coordination, and controlled pipelines — where timing, reliability, and acknowledgment matter just as much as concurrency.