Skip to content

Define the included fields by API version #264

@edgarrmondragon

Description

@edgarrmondragon

Comment following the merging of #262:

To be complete, an additional suggestion.

As this kind of issue may appear again with later versions, it would probably be more reliable to keep the excluded fields associated with a specific api version, or define the included fields by version…

cc @guillaumemeyer

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions