You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#> [1] "One-sided group sequential design with 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 490 and 301 events, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters). With hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter, the power is 90 percent."
43
+
#> [1] "One-sided group sequential design with 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 490 and 301 events, 90 percent power, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error to detect hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters)."
44
44
45
45
# Text summary of a 2-sided symmetric design
46
46
x<- gs_design_ahr(info_frac=1:3/3,
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ x <- gs_design_ahr(info_frac = 1:3/3,
49
49
lpar=list(sf=sfLDOF, total_spend=0.025),
50
50
binding=TRUE, h1_spending=FALSE) |> to_integer()
51
51
x|> text_summary()
52
-
#> [1] "Symmetric two-sided group sequential design with 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 490 and 301 events, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters). With hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter, the power is 90 percent."
52
+
#> [1] "Symmetric two-sided group sequential design with 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 490 and 301 events, 90 percent power, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error to detect hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters)."
53
53
54
54
# Text summary of a asymmetric 2-sided design with beta-spending and non-binding futility bound
#> [1] "Asymmetric two-sided group sequential design with non-binding futility bound, 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 500 and 306 events, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 35.9 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters). Futility bounds derived using a Hwang-Shih-DeCani spending function with gamma = -4. With hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter, the power is 90 percent."
61
+
#> [1] "Asymmetric two-sided group sequential design with non-binding futility bound, 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 500 and 306 events, 90 percent power, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error to detect hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 35.9 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters). Futility bounds derived using a Hwang-Shih-DeCani spending function with gamma = -4."
62
62
63
63
# Text summary of a asymmetric 2-sided design with fixed non-binding futility bound
#> [1] "Asymmetric two-sided group sequential design with non-binding futility bound, 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 506 and 311 events, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters), tested at tested at IA2, FA. Futility bounds is fixed as -1, -Inf, -Inf, tested at tested at IA1. With hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter, the power is 90 percent."
72
+
#> [1] "Asymmetric two-sided group sequential design with non-binding futility bound, 3 analyses, time-to-event outcome with sample size 506 and 311 events, 90 percent power, 2.5 percent (1-sided) Type I error to detect hazard ratio of 0.9 during the first 3 months and 0.6 thereafter. Enrollment and total study durations are assumed to be 14 and 36.1 months, respectively. Efficacy bounds derived using a Lan-DeMets O'Brien-Fleming approximation spending function (no parameters), tested at tested at IA2, FA. Futility bounds is fixed as -1, -Inf, -Inf, tested at tested at IA1."
73
73
74
74
# If there are >5 pieces of HRs, we provide a brief summary of HR.
0 commit comments