-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
Open
Description
I analyzed agent wallets using the DeleGator framework on Base and found extremely low gas efficiency of just 4.18%.
Example wallet: 0x464fc339add314932920d3e060745bd7ea3e92ad
Findings:
- 258 failed transactions (all reverted, 0 out-of-gas)
- Average gas limit set: ~20x higher than actual gas used
- Estimated monthly waste: $71.35 per agent
- Gas efficiency: 4.18% (meaning 95.82% of allocated gas goes unused)
Expected behavior:
Gas limits should be closer to actual usage (targeting 70-90% efficiency range)
Actual behavior:
Gas limits appear to be massively over-estimated, causing users to lock up unnecessary capital and potentially pay higher priority fees.
Impact:
Agents using this framework are wasting significant funds on oversized gas allocations.
Is this a known issue with the gas estimation logic in EIP-7702 proxy implementations?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels