Skip to content

Conversation

@jansenbe
Copy link
Contributor

Added -DelayContentSecurityPolicyEnforcement parameter to control enforcement timing of Content Security Policy checking.

Added -DelayContentSecurityPolicyEnforcement parameter to control enforcement timing of Content Security Policy checking.
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

PoliCheck Scan Report

The following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 issues. Other issues are also a high priority. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans.

✅ No issues found

More information about PoliCheck

Information: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term
For any questions: Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides or post your question in the Learn support channel.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 63f98f2:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
sharepoint/sharepoint-ps/Microsoft.Online.SharePoint.PowerShell/Set-SPOTenant.md ✅Succeeded View (sharepoint-ps)

For more details, please refer to the build report.


> Applicable: SharePoint Online

This parameter allows administrators to delay the [enforcement of Content Security Policy checking](https://aka.ms/spfx/csp) from March 1, 2026 to June 1, 2026.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://aka.ms/spfx/csp

as this resolves to a learn.more link, let's use it:

/sharepoint/dev/spfx/content-securty-policy-trusted-script-sources

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@samkabue : I on purpose added an aka.ms link as we might want to change this a blog post. If that's an option then let's indeed change to the learn link

Copy link
Contributor

@samkabue samkabue Oct 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jansenbe for docs links they prefer linking directly (in this case using relative link). that said let's not block this PR since I know there's the server code waiting for this.

(ideally the aka.ms are, e.g., for sharing with customers, while in here we reference the actual doc link directly)

@samkabue samkabue added the Sign off The pull request is ready to be reviewed and merged by PubOps label Oct 28, 2025
@Ruchika-mittal01 Ruchika-mittal01 self-assigned this Oct 28, 2025
@Ruchika-mittal01 Ruchika-mittal01 added the In review PubOps is reviewing the pull request label Oct 28, 2025
@Ruchika-mittal01 Ruchika-mittal01 merged commit 7026a36 into MicrosoftDocs:main Oct 28, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

In review PubOps is reviewing the pull request Microsoft submitter Sign off The pull request is ready to be reviewed and merged by PubOps

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants