You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: articles/search/search-relevance-overview.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ In a query operation, the relevance of any given result is measured by a ranking
17
17
18
18
Ranking occurs whenever the query request includes full text or vector queries. It doesn't occur if the query invokes strict pattern matching, such as a filter-only query or a specialized query form like autocomplete, suggestions, geospatial search, fuzzy search, or regular expression search. A uniform search score of 1.0 indicates the absence of a ranking algorithm.
19
19
20
-
***Relevance tuning*** is primarily centered on textual content, applying scoring profiles or semantic ranking to enhance the quality of results. For vectors, you can experiment between Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) and exhaustive K-nearest neighbors (KNN) to see if one algorithm outperforms the other for your scenario. HNSW graphing with an exhaustive KNN override at query time is the most flexible approach for testing. You can also experiment with various embedding models to see which ones produce higher quality results.
20
+
***Relevance tuning*** is primarily directed at textual content, applying scoring profiles or semantic ranking to enhance the quality of search results. For vector content, there's no explicit relevance tuning capabilities, but you can experiment between Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) and exhaustive K-nearest neighbors (KNN) to see if one algorithm outperforms the other for your scenario. HNSW graphing with an exhaustive KNN override at query time is the most flexible approach for comparison testing. You can also experiment with various embedding models to see which ones produce higher quality results.
0 commit comments