Including more details of Reviews by Owners

Based on testing, I believe this segment of the doc should contain additional details on what happens if a group owner is changed during the course of a review.

Feel free to contact me for further discussion before approving this change.

Author: LucasLeitao-MSFT

articles/active-directory/governance/create-access-review.md

@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ If you are reviewing access to an application, then before creating the review,
 
    If you choose either **Managers of users** or **Group owner(s)**, you can also specify a fallback reviewer. Fallback reviewers are asked to do a review when the user has no manager specified in the directory or if the group doesn't have an owner.
 
+    > [!NOTE]  
+    > In a team or group access review, only the group owners (at the time the review starts) are considered as reviewers. During the course of a review, if the list of group owners is updated, new group owners will not be considered reviewers as well as old group owners will still be considered reviewers. However, in the case of a recurring review, any changes on the group owners list will be considered in the next instance of that review.
+
     >[!IMPORTANT]
     > For PIM for Groups (Preview), you must select **Group owner(s)**. It is mandatory to assign at least one fallback reviewer to the review. The review will only assign active owner(s) as the reviewer(s). Eligible owners are not included. If there are no active owners when the review begins, the fallback reviewer(s) will be assigned to the review.