You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: articles/firewall/logs-and-metrics.md
+7-4Lines changed: 7 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ The following metrics are available for Azure Firewall:
169
169
- Status: Possible values are *Healthy*, *Degraded*, *Unhealthy*.
170
170
- Reason: Indicates the reason for the corresponding status of the firewall.
171
171
172
-
If SNAT ports are used > 95%, they are considered exhausted and the health is 50% with status=**Degraded** and reason=**SNAT port**. The firewall keeps processing traffic and existing connections are not affected. However, new connections may not be established intermittently.
172
+
If SNAT ports are used > 95%, they're considered exhausted and the health is 50% with status=**Degraded** and reason=**SNAT port**. The firewall keeps processing traffic and existing connections aren't affected. However, new connections may not be established intermittently.
173
173
174
174
If SNAT ports are used < 95%, then firewall is considered healthy and health is shown as 100%.
175
175
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ The following metrics are available for Azure Firewall:
195
195
196
196
- There may be various reasons that can cause high latency in Azure Firewall. For example, high CPU utilization, high throughput, or a possible networking issue.
197
197
198
-
This metric does not measure end-to-end latency of a given network path. In other words, this latency health probe does not measure how much latency Azure Firewall adds.
198
+
This metric doesn't measure end-to-end latency of a given network path. In other words, this latency health probe doesn't measure how much latency Azure Firewall adds.
199
199
200
-
- When the latency metric is not functioning as expected, a value of 0 appears in the metrics dashboard.
201
-
- As a reference, the average expected latency for a firewall is approximately 1 m/s. This may vary depending on deployment size and environment.
200
+
- When the latency metric isn't functioning as expected, a value of 0 appears in the metrics dashboard.
201
+
- As a reference, the average expected latency for a firewall is approximately 1 m/s. This may vary depending on deployment size and environment.
202
+
- The latency probe is based on Microsoft's Ping Mesh technology. So, intermittent spikes in the latency metric are to be expected. These spikes are normal and don't signal an issue with the Azure Firewall. They're part of the standard host networking setup that supports the system.
203
+
204
+
As a result, if you experience consistent high latency that last longer than typical spikes, consider filing a Support ticket for assistance.
0 commit comments