Update troubleshoot-route-server.md

Author: siddomala

articles/route-server/troubleshoot-route-server.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Yes, this is expected behavior. User-defined routes with next hop type **Virtual
 
 ### In my VM's network interface's effective routes, why do I have a user-defined route (UDR) with next hop type set to **None**? 
 
-If you advertise a route from your NVA to Route Server that is an exact prefix match as another user-defined route, then the advertised route's next hop must be valid. If the advertised next hop is a load balancer without a configured backend pool, then this invalid route will take precedence over the user-defined route. In your network interface's effective routes, the invalid advertised route will be displayed as a user-defined route with Next Hop Type set to **None**. 
+If you advertise a route from your NVA to Route Server that is an exact prefix match as another user-defined route, then the advertised route's next hop must be valid. If the advertised next hop is a load balancer without a configured backend pool, then this invalid route will take precedence over the user-defined route. In your network interface's effective routes, the invalid advertised route will be displayed as a user-defined route with next hop type set to **None**. 
 
 ### Why do I lose connectivity after associating a service endpoint policy to the RouteServerSubnet or GatewaySubnet?