Skip to content

Commit 18d9334

Browse files
Merge pull request #287039 from wtnlee/criupdates3
done
2 parents 46cf9ce + 313f9da commit 18d9334

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-1
lines changed

articles/virtual-wan/whats-new.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ The following features are currently in gated public preview. After working with
9595
|4| ExpressRoute ECMP Support | Today, ExpressRoute ECMP is not enabled by default for virtual hub deployments. When multiple ExpressRoute circuits are connected to a Virtual WAN hub, ECMP enables traffic from spoke virtual networks to on-premises over ExpressRoute to be distributed across all ExpressRoute circuits advertising the same on-premises routes. | | To enable ECMP for your Virtual WAN hub, please reach out to [email protected]. |
9696
| 5| Virtual WAN hub address prefixes are not advertised to other Virtual WAN hubs in the same Virtual WAN.| You can't leverage Virtual WAN hub-to-hub full mesh routing capabilities to provide connectivity between NVA orchestration software deployed in a VNET or on-premises connected to a Virtual WAN hub to an Integrated NVA or SaaS solution deployed in a different Virtual WAN hub. | | If your NVA or SaaS orchestrator is deployed on-premises, connect that on-premises site to all Virtual WAN hubs with NVAs or SaaS solutions deployed in them. If your orchestrator is in an Azure VNET, manage NVAs or SaaS solutions using public IP. Support for Azure VNET orchestrators is on the roadmap.|
9797
|6| Configuring routing intent to route between connectivity and firewall NVAs in the same Virtual WAN Hub| Virtual WAN routing intent private routing policy does not support routing between a SD-WAN NVA and a Firewall NVA (or SaaS solution) deployed in the same Virtual hub.| | Deploy the connectivity and firewall integrated NVAs in two different hubs in the same Azure region. Alternatively, deploy the connectivity NVA to a spoke Virtual Network connected to your Virtual WAN Hub and leverage the [BGP peering](scenario-bgp-peering-hub.md).|
98-
| 7| BGP between the Virtual WAN hub router and NVAs deployed in the Virtual WAN hub does not come up if the ASN used for BGP peering is updated post-deployment.|Delete and recreate the NVA with the correct ASN. |
98+
| 7| BGP between the Virtual WAN hub router and NVAs deployed in the Virtual WAN hub does not come up if the ASN used for BGP peering is updated post-deployment.|Virtual Hub router expects NVA in the hub to use the ASN that was configured on the router when the NVA was first deployed. Updating the ASN associated with the NVA on the NVA resource does not properly register the new ASN with the Virtual Hub router so the router rejects BGP sessions from the NVA if the NVA OS is configured to use the new ASN. | |Delete and recreate the NVA in the Virtual WAN hub with the correct ASN.|
99+
|8| Advertising default route (0.0.0.0/0) from on-premises (VPN, ExpressRoute, BGP endpoint) or statically configured on a Virtual Network connection is not supported for forced tunneling use cases.| The 0.0.0.0/0 route advertised from on-premises (or statically configured on a Virtual Network connection) is not applied to the Azure Firewall or other security solutions deployed in the Virtual WAN hub. Packets inspected by the security solution in the hub are routed directly to the internet, bypassing the route learnt from on-premises||Publish the default route from on-premises only in non-secure hub scenarios.|
100+
99101

100102
## Next steps
101103

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)