update

Author: Y-Sindo

articles/azure-functions/functions-bindings-signalr-service-trigger.md

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The following sample shows a C# function that receives a message event from clie
 :::code language="csharp" source="~/azure-functions-dotnet-worker/samples/Extensions/SignalR/SignalRTriggerFunctions.cs" id="snippet_on_message":::
 
 > [!IMPORTANT]
-> Class based model of SignalR Service bindings in C# isolated worker doesn't optimize how you write SignalR triggers due to the limitation of C# worker model. You can use class based model for SignalR input binding and output bindings. For more information about class based model, see [Class based model](../azure-signalr/signalr-concept-serverless-development-config.md#class-based-model).
+> Class based model of SignalR Service bindings in C# isolated worker doesn't optimize how you write SignalR triggers due to the limitation of C# worker model. For more information about class based model, see [Class based model](../azure-signalr/signalr-concept-serverless-development-config.md#class-based-model).
 
 # [In-process model](#tab/in-process)
 

articles/azure-signalr/signalr-concept-serverless-development-config.md

@@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ public class Functions : ServerlessHub<IChatClient>
 }
 ```
 
-> [!IMPORTANT]
+> [!NOTE]
 > You can get a complete project sample from [GitHub](https://github.com/aspnet/AzureSignalR-samples/tree/main/samples/DotnetIsolated-ClassBased/).
 
-### Unified connection string setting in one place.
+### Unified connection string setting in one place
 
 You might have noticed the `SignalRConnection` attribute used on serverless hub classes. It looks like this:
 ```cs